This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Shopping for an Electronic Health Record System?
2012 EHR User Satisfaction Survey Provides Feedback From FP Colleagues
By Sheri Porter
Kenneth Adler, M.D., coauthor of the survey report, confirmed to AAFP News Now that this was the fifth EHR user satisfaction survey undertaken by FPM. The timing of the 2012 survey came just 16 months after what is usually a biennial project.
"We did it sooner this time given the rapidly accelerated EHR adoption that has occurred since the CMS EHR incentive programs got underway last year," said Adler.
story highlights
- Family Practice Management has released the results of its 2012 electronic health record (EHR) user satisfaction survey.
- The 2012 survey garnered more physician responses -- 3,088 -- than any other survey in the series.
- Usability issues, lost productivity and lack of vendor support are issues of concern to physicians.
He noted that more than 200 EHR products are currently on the market. "We want to help family physicians zoom in on the products that their fellow family physicians both use and have found most satisfying," said Adler.
The survey itself fulfills multiple needs. For example, it contains critical information to help FPs select their first EHR system or replace an existing system that's underperforming.
"We'd like to help folks choose well. Making a poor choice can have a hugely negative impact on a practice," said Adler.
The information gathered in the survey also provides feedback to EHR vendors whose products -- at least in the eyes of physician users -- could use some adjustments.
Adler pointed out that only 38 percent of users participating in the survey were highly satisfied with their EHRs. "Usability issues and negative impact on physician productivity continue to be concerns," said Adler. "Vendor support remains an area of weakness for EHR vendors."
Survey Highlights
Practices of various sizes were represented in the survey. Nearly half of survey respondents hailed from practices with 10 or fewer physicians and almost as many came from practices of more than 20 physicians.
In one portion of the survey, participants were asked to note their level of agreement or disagreement with 19 statements about EHRs using these terms: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree and unsure.
For example, family physicians were asked about the ease of documentation, clarity of information display, help in avoiding mistakes, ability to create notes that promote better patient care, availability of useful preventive medicine tools and ability of the system to process electronic prescriptions.
Survey takers also were asked their general satisfaction with their system and if they enjoyed using their EHRs.
Physicians supplied answers that helped study authors make some overall observations based on positive responses. For example, regarding top areas of satisfaction, users were most happy with the way their EHRs
- facilitated intra-office messaging and tasking (60 percent),
- found information (58 percent),
- documented data (57 percent), and
- facilitated electronic prescribing (56 percent).
- effect on productivity (16 percent),
- effect on the physician's ability to focus on patient care (24 percent), and
- vendor support (36 percent).
Authors noted that, as in past surveys, their goal was not to pick EHR system winners in terms of user satisfaction.
Using Survey Content
"Study it," said Adler. "Don't just look at one rating or number. There isn't one best system. Give extra weight to the elements that strike you as most important." For even more data, graphs for the responses to all 19 statements are in an online appendix (19-page PDF; About PDFs).
The bottom line for family physicians is that choosing an EHR still isn't easy. "Do your homework and tread carefully," urged Adler. "Unfortunately EHRs still have a long way to go to achieve widespread satisfaction. But do pick one."
What Do Nearly 2,800 Family Docs Think About Their EHRs?
FPM Publishes Fourth EHR User Satisfaction Survey
(8/9/2011)
This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Webinar Explores Practice Space Redesign
Patient Self-Management Focus of Webinar Series
Preparing for, Surviving Meaningful Use Audit
Direct Primary Care Offers Different Health Care Model
Webinar Addresses Direct Primary Care Practices
Support Helps Small Practices Transform to PCMH
FPs Look at Benefits, Problems With EHRs
Medicare Launches Bundled Payment Initiative
AAFP Reacts to CMS Proposed Rule
AAFP Makes Case for New Primary Care E/M Codes
Studies Look at Two Models to Improve Diabetes Care
Audits Delay Some EHR Bonus Payments
Webinar: Expert Tackles Meaningful Use Stage Two
Tools for ICD-10 Implementation Available From CMS
Research Compares e-Visits Versus Office Visits
'Time Out' on Meaningful Use Stage Three Rule-making
AAFP Offers Transitional Care Management Tools
Free Webinar Offers Guidance on ICD-10 Preparation
Primary Care Team Roles Can Enhance Patient Care
Proposed Rule Chips Away at Medicare Regulations
HHS Rolls Out HIPAA Omnibus Rule
EHR Adoption Rate Among FPs Continues to Climb
CMS Adds 106 New ACOs to Programs
White Paper Pursues Strategies to Overcome EHR Pitfalls
Webinar Offers Primer on PCMH Basics
Primary Care, PCMH Future of Health Care
Free Webinar Sorts Out Medicare Fee Schedule Details
HHS Should Delay, Rein in Meaningful Use Requirements
FP Steps Up During Hurricane Sandy
Physicians Without eRx Exemption Face Penalty
Organization Lists Top Five Physicians' Issues for 2013
