This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
New CPT Code Edits Could Worsen Already Low Adult Vaccine Uptake
FPs Report Payment for Immunization Administration Trumps E/M Services
By News Staff
In a Feb. 20 letter (2-page PDF; About PDFs) to NCCI Medical Director Niles Rosen, M.D., the AAFP said that family physicians already were reporting that some Medicaid plans and other payers were denying payment for E/M services based on the edits. "The reality is that the edit creates an extra barrier that practices must overcome while seeking proper payment for vaccine administration," said AAFP Board Chair Glen Stream, M.D., M.B.I., of Spokane, Wash.
story highlights
- The AAFP recently called for the revocation of new CPT code edits initiated through the National Correct Coding Initiative.
- The edits in question allow insurers to pay the vaccine administration portion of a claim and reject payment for evaluation and management services.
- Such coding and payment complexities could lead to a decrease in adult vaccine administration, said the AAFP.
Stream added that the edit was "especially problematic" in the case of preventive medicine visits billed with CPT codes 99381 to 99397, during which vaccines most often are administered.
Stream acknowledged that on Feb. 1, CMS gave the nod to state Medicaid agencies to choose to "deactivate" the edit for the first quarter of 2013 retroactive to Jan. 1. As a result, the AAFP urged all states to promptly follow up with deactivation and then went a step further when it called on the NCCI "to revoke this particular edit altogether."
The same code edit issue was the focus of a Feb. 7 entry in Family Practice Management's "Getting Paid" blog. Blog author Kent Moore, the AAFP's senior strategist for physician payment, noted that the latest round of coding edits included about 300 changes that affect E/M services and vaccine administration.
Referring specifically to CPT codes between 90460 and 90474, Moore said that in each case, "the administration code trumps the E/M code" when it comes to which service Medicare and other insurers recognize for payment.
Moore updated the blog on Feb. 14 to reflect CMS' decision to allow state Medicaid agencies to deactivate the edit for the first quarter.
This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Preparing for, Surviving Meaningful Use Audit
Direct Primary Care Offers Different Health Care Model
Webinar Addresses Direct Primary Care Practices
Support Helps Small Practices Transform to PCMH
FPs Look at Benefits, Problems With EHRs
Medicare Launches Bundled Payment Initiative
AAFP Reacts to CMS Proposed Rule
AAFP Makes Case for New Primary Care E/M Codes
Studies Look at Two Models to Improve Diabetes Care
Audits Delay Some EHR Bonus Payments
Webinar: Expert Tackles Meaningful Use Stage Two
Tools for ICD-10 Implementation Available From CMS
Research Compares e-Visits Versus Office Visits
'Time Out' on Meaningful Use Stage Three Rule-making
AAFP Offers Transitional Care Management Tools
AAFP Protests CPT Code Edits
Free Webinar Offers Guidance on ICD-10 Preparation
Primary Care Team Roles Can Enhance Patient Care
Proposed Rule Chips Away at Medicare Regulations
HHS Rolls Out HIPAA Omnibus Rule
EHR Adoption Rate Among FPs Continues to Climb
CMS Adds 106 New ACOs to Programs
White Paper Pursues Strategies to Overcome EHR Pitfalls
Webinar Offers Primer on PCMH Basics
Primary Care, PCMH Future of Health Care
Free Webinar Sorts Out Medicare Fee Schedule Details
HHS Should Delay, Rein in Meaningful Use Requirements
FP Steps Up During Hurricane Sandy
Physicians Without eRx Exemption Face Penalty
Organization Lists Top Five Physicians' Issues for 2013
