AAFP Offers Input as PAs Consider Specialty Certification
By News Staff
7/12/2006
Physician assistants, who already obtain certification as PAs, are considering creating specialty recognition or certification programs. In response, the Academy has advised PAs to beware of creating "specialty silos."
AAFP Board Chair Mary Frank, M.D., of Mill Valley, Calif., conveyed the Academy's misgivings about specialty certification for PAs in a July 7 letter to Janet Lathrop, M.B.A., president and executive director of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, or NCCPA.
The AAFP "notes that many PAs do not support the creation of specialty-specific certification exams as a condition of practicing in a specialty setting," said Frank. "This is congruent with AAFP policy that credentialing should be based upon training, experience and demonstrated competence, and not based on a single certification."
According to a document from a forum the NCCPA held in June that included 31 PA and physician specialty and PA professional organizations, the NCCPA identified several themes from the meeting. According to the document, for many PAs, "specialty recognition is acceptable, while specialty certification is not." In addition, the forum document noted that "PAs do not want any new program to become a requirement."
Frank made three key points in her letter:
The AAFP "notes that many PAs do not support the creation of specialty-specific certification exams as a condition of practicing in a specialty setting," said Frank. "This is congruent with AAFP policy that credentialing should be based upon training, experience and demonstrated competence, and not based on a single certification."
According to a document from a forum the NCCPA held in June that included 31 PA and physician specialty and PA professional organizations, the NCCPA identified several themes from the meeting. According to the document, for many PAs, "specialty recognition is acceptable, while specialty certification is not." In addition, the forum document noted that "PAs do not want any new program to become a requirement."
Frank made three key points in her letter:
- "The PA profession has been well-served by its foundations in generalism, time-limited certification and lifelong learning."
- "The role of the supervising physician remains important in PA practice, and an emphasis on documented training and competency must be preserved."
- "The recognition of both training and experience of PAs practicing in specialties must be approached judiciously to avoid the creation of 'specialty silos' that will limit PAs' employment flexibility and mobility."
An NCCPA task force will consider the forum's work and input submitted by groups such as the Academy. The task force is expected to report in August to the NCCPA Board of Directors concerning specialty certification.
Professional Issues
BCBS Compliance Dispute Program Up and Running
Study Examines Role of Retail Health Clinics
ACEP Take on PC-MH Sparks AAFP Response
Colorado Enacts Physician Profiling Measure
Report: Boost Primary Care Workforce
AMA Asks Selected FPs to Complete Survey
New Purchasing Guide Promotes Medical Home
Lack of Payment Reform Results in Fragmented Care
PhRMA Announces New Ethical Code
Report Addresses Care Access Barriers
AMA Opposes DNPs as Medical Team Leaders
AHIP Plan Slashes Health Care Costs








