This was successfully posted to your pofile.
This box will close automatically in a few seconds. Close this window
We don't have an e-mail address on file for you. To use AAFP Connection, you must have an e-mail address in our records. Click Here
Family Medicine Groups Urge MedPAC to Adopt New Recommendations on GME Funding
By News Staff
"Family medicine organizations have long proposed modernization of funding of graduate medical education for primary care production and training," say the organizations in the comment letter.
In the 1960s, when the program started, the decision to tie GME financing to inpatient hospital activity was logical because at that time it served as the locus of substantially all care delivery, according to the letter. During the past 45 years, however, this delivery mechanism and locus have changed considerably.
"This is particularly true for primary care which is delivered predominantly in outpatient, ambulatory, community-based office and other settings," says the letter. "Yet the obstacles preventing this training from taking place effectively are abundant."
The organizations also are calling on MedPAC to recommend a 5-year pilot program to evaluate modernized funding models for primary care training. Such a pilot could be budget neutral and would cost a fraction of the current allocation for GME, says the comment letter.
"Family medicine believes one concrete step toward accountability would be to publish an annual report of the total GME dollars received by each hospital and a requirement that each hospital report on the amount it has dedicated to primary care training and results obtained from that expenditure," says the letter.
The analysis should include measurement of the number of primary care physicians at the end of training rather than when a student enters the initial residency program. This would help ensure that the number of primary care physicians trained is recorded as the actual number of physicians who enter primary care practice, according to the organizations.
In the comment letter, the organizations stress their support for enhanced accountability for GME financing, saying that such accountability should be based on a thorough analysis of the existing and needed workforce. MedPAC should determine
- who benefits from physician training;
- if the beneficiaries of physician care should contribute to physician training through some mechanism;
- if funding is purposeful, predictable and stable;
- the size and specialty mix of physician workforce needed; and
- if current funding mechanisms and priorities lead to the desired workforce.
Match Results: 2010 Fill Rate for Family Medicine Highest Ever
Health, Payment Reform Key to Sustaining Interest, Academy Leaders Say
AAFP's New Physician Workforce Report Represents 'Blueprint for Change'
Report Addresses Planning, Distribution, GME Funding Needs
Primary Care Physician Shortages Can Be Traced Largely to Pipeline Issues, Says FP