The American Diabetes Association (ADA) released its Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 with updates to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and diabetes management. The standards reflect the most current evidence and best practices in clinical care, informed by science and leading experts, and use the evidence ratings below to keep diabetes care at the cutting edge.
Evidence ratings:
A, B, or C – Based on the strength of clinical trial data
E – Expert consensus when research evidence is limited
A major highlight is the enhanced guidance on CGM, providing information on new technologies and approaches to individualized diabetes care.
Key developments for using CGM in clinical settings include:
For the first time, the recommendations go beyond “considering” CGM and now recommend its use for adults with type 2 diabetes—even for those on glucose-lowering therapies other than insulin or in cases where CGM can improve management, regardless of the treatment approach.
Change for 2026: Older adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy were added to the recommendation to expand CGM to that population.
This new recommendation helps reduce barriers for people with diabetes using insulin by making it easier to adopt advanced diabetes technology.
This inclusion demonstrates the value of CGM across diverse populations as a standard of care in diabetes management.
This shift reflects growing evidence that rtCGM is a standard of care.
The Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 contributes to advancing clinical recommendations, facilitating expanded insurance coverage, and enabling earlier use of diabetes technology. These changes allow family medicine clinicians and their patients to more readily implement CGM across all life stages, thereby promoting a personalized and proactive approach to diabetes management.
As coverage policies evolve alongside these standards, you can quickly check your patients’ eligibility and streamline CGM access by using the Dexcom Coverage Evaluator tool.
MAT-12462
Disclaimer:
The posting of information and content on this page should not be considered an AAFP endorsement or recommendation of the partner or sponsor organization’s products, services, policies or procedures. The information and opinions expressed are those of partners and paid sponsors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the AAFP. The AAFP is not responsible for the content of third-party websites linked from this page. Any links on this page to third-party websites where goods and services are advertised are not endorsements or recommendations by the AAFP of the third-party sites, goods or services.