Exercise During Pregnancy: What Do We Really Know?


Am Fam Physician. 2004 Mar 1;69(5):1053-1056.

As a result of a number of recent studies on exercise in pregnancy, the debate over the risks of aerobic exercise in pregnancy has waned. In January 2002, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued an opinion report stating that “In the absence of either medical or obstetric complications, 30 minutes or more of moderate exercise a day on most, if not all, days of the week is recommended for most pregnant women.”1 While common sense and a number of smaller observational studies and controlled trials support this recommendation, a Cochrane review,2 published in the same month as the ACOG opinion, concluded that there is insufficient evidence of benefit or harm to mother or fetus to make a recommendation regarding aerobic exercise in pregnancy. According to the review, the available studies were too small, flawed in their design, and inconsistent in their methodology and outcome measures to support a recommendation. Specific benefits of regular exercise to mother and fetus have yet to be confirmed.

The recent ACOG Committee Opinion signals a welcome interest in the benefits of regular aerobic exercise in pregnancy and a trend away from focusing on a variety of theoretic risks to mother and baby. In terms of positive benefits, the Cochrane reviewer found that women who exercised regularly during pregnancy subjectively improved their body image and maintained or improved their physical fitness. No other benefits (or risks) were supported by the currently available studies. Parameters studied include mode of delivery, length of labor, growth parameters, preterm birth, and Apgar scores.

Despite the limitations of current evidence, several studies suggest that smaller babies are born to women who exercise vigorously during pregnancy, as a result of restriction of neonatal fat mass. It also has been suggested that these leaner babies may be less likely to become obese children and adults.3 At the very least, pregnancy is a time when women have regular contact with physicians and may be open to general lifestyle changes that might benefit them. Excess weight gain during pregnancy and postpartum weight retention are associated with increased rates of maternal obesity eight to 10 years later.4

Given the current epidemic of obesity and the associated rising incidence in rates of the metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes, it would seem that well-designed, large-scale prospective clinical trials of exercise in pregnancy should be high on the national research agenda, in line with priorities established by Healthy People 2010. Long-term follow-up of the exercising women and their infants could help to clarify the real benefits versus the risks of exercise during pregnancy and allow future recommendations to be based on evidence rather than expert opinion.

For many women, the perceived benefits of physical fitness and enhanced body image provide enough reason to continue to exercise during pregnancy. However, little has been published about the acceptability of exercise in pregnancy to women of diverse cultural backgrounds. Given the high prevalence of obesity and overweight among women in some population subgroups,5 it even may be desirable to provide extra encouragement to exercise during pregnancy, as well as in general. However, successful implementation of the recent ACOG recommendations will require that women find the idea of exercising during pregnancy to be culturally acceptable. Therefore, understanding the attitude of women from diverse backgrounds toward exercise in pregnancy is important.

Given ACOG's statement that potential risks are rare in properly screened pregnant women who avoid extreme environmental conditions and activities that can lead to abdominal trauma, moderate aerobic exercise appears to be a safe, affordable way to improve a woman's sense of well-being during pregnancy. The shift in attitude away from viewing aerobic exercise as a potential hazard to healthy pregnant women is a breath of fresh air. We look forward to the day when sound evidence supports more definitive guidelines about exercise in pregnancy.

The Authors

show all author info

Susan Snyder, M.D., is associate clinical professor of family medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif. She also is the director of the Primary Care Faculty Development Center at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, Calif....

Bernadette Pendergraph, M.D., is a faculty member in the family medicine residency program at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif., where she coordinates the sports medicine curriculum.

Address correspondence to Susan Snyder, M.D., Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, 1403 W. Lomita Blvd., Suite 102, Harbor City, CA 90710. Reprints are not available from the authors.


show all references

1. ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion, No. 267, January 2002: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:171–3....

2. Kramer MS. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD000180.

3. Magann EF, Evans SF, Weitz B, Newnham J. Antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal significance of exercise on healthy low-risk pregnant working women. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:466–72.

4. Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long term obesity: one decade later. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:245–52.

5. The surgeon general's call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. 2001. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md. Accessed online February 6, 2004, at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/CalltoAction.pdf.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in Pubmed


Jan 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article