Management of Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation


Am Fam Physician. 2004 May 15;69(10):2314-2321.

  Related Content

Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia in adults, with the prevalence increasing from less than 1 percent in persons younger than 60 years to more than 8 percent in those older than 80 years.1 Each year in the United States, there are more than 700,000 admissions for cardiac dysrhythmias,2 with about one third of these resulting from atrial fibrillation.3 The aging of the U.S. population will make this problem even more prevalent in the day-to-day practice of physicians providing primary care to adults.

In this issue of American Family Physician,4 the clinical practice guideline created by a joint panel of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and the American College of Physicians (ACP) in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center is summarized.5 This guideline is one product of the effort of the AAFP to promote evidence-based practice. When the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) first established the evidence-based practice centers and solicited topics for examination, the AAFP recommended an evidence review of the management of newly detected atrial fibrillation. AAFP members and staff served as consultants to the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center at the time. The Center’s report on atrial fibrillation served as the foundation for the collaborative efforts of the ACP and the AAFP in the production of this guideline. This is the first guideline specifically created by a joint review and synthesis of the literature by these organizations, and it was clear during the process that they share the goal of promoting evidence-based, patient-centered practice. It is hoped that this will be the first of many collaborative efforts.

The evidence reviewed supports a straightforward approach to management for most patients with atrial fibrillation. The central question facing physicians is whether to restore and maintain sinus rhythm, or to control heart rate and prevent stroke. Rhythm control is not superior to the combination of rate control and chronic anticoagulation in reducing morbidity and mortality, and rhythm control may be associated with higher mortality rates in some patient subgroups.

Rate control and prevention of stroke are the mainstays of atrial fibrillation management. Rate control is best accomplished with atenolol, metoprolol, diltiazem, or verapamil. Prevention of stroke requires adjusted-dose warfarin unless the patient has a very low risk of stroke or a specific contraindication to the use of warfarin. As physicians, we tend to consider “soft” contraindications, such as risk of falling. Results from studies using adjusted-dose warfarin clearly show that the benefits generally outweigh the harms, so we must be cautious when avoiding warfarin in the context of relative or theoretical contraindications. We need to balance the theoretical, even unproven, risk of some adverse complication of anticoagulation with the proven benefit of stroke prevention.

This guideline provides an outline for the care of the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation. Care will be straightforward for most of these patients and can be accomplished in the office of the family physician.

The Author

Michael L. LeFevre, M.D., M.S.P.H., is professor and director of clinical services in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Missouri–Columbia. Dr. LeFevre is a member of the joint panel on atrial fibrillation.

Address correspondence to Michael LeFevre, M.D., M.S.P.H., University of Missouri–Columbia, Department of Family and Community Medicine, MA 303, Health Sciences Center, Columbia, MO 65212. (e-mail:lefevrem@health.missouri.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.


show all references

1. McNamara RL, Tamariz LJ, Segal JB, Bass EB. Management of atrial fibrillation: review of the evidence for the role of pharmacologic therapy, electrical cardioversion, and echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:1018–33....

2. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ. 2001 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2003;332:1–20.

3. Bialy D, Lehmann MH, Schumacher DN, Steinman RT, Meissner MD. Hospitalization for arrhythmias in the United States: importance of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(3 suppl A):41A

4. AAFP and ACP release practice guideline on management of newly detected atrial fibrillation. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:2474–5.

5. Snow V, Weiss KB, LeFevre M, McNamara R, Bass E, Green LA, et al. Management of newly detected atrial fibrillation: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:1009–17.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in Pubmed


Nov 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article