Tips from Other Journals

Inadequate Compliance with UTI Guidelines for Children


Am Fam Physician. 2005 Dec 15;72(12):2532-2537.

Vesicoureteral reflux can put a child at risk of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) and renal scarring. UTIs occurring in children younger than two years should be investigated with renal ultrasonography and either radionuclide or voiding cystourethrography. If a child has unknown or identified reflux, he or she should receive antimicrobial prophylaxis. Although these recommendations have not gone unchallenged, they remain usual care, particularly in high-risk children with uncertain follow-up. Cohen and colleagues sought to determine the extent to which these guidelines are followed.

This retrospective cohort study included children enrolled in a Medicaid program who were diagnosed with a UTI in the first year of life. Associated studies and antimicrobial prophylaxis carried out within three months of the diagnosis were evaluated. Of 780 patients identified as having a UTI in the first year of life, 302 were hospitalized. Almost 60 percent of patients were female, and most were white or Hispanic. Less than one half of all diagnosed children received anatomic imaging or imaging for reflux within the designated time frame. Less than one third (28.2 percent) received both types of imaging. One half (51 percent) of children who received imaging for reflux were given prophylactic antibiotics as recommended. The children who were hospitalized for UTI were significantly more likely to receive appropriate imaging (relative risk [RR], 1.38 for anatomic imaging and 1.62 for reflux imaging). Children 90 days or younger were less likely to receive antibiotic prophylaxis (RR, 0.59) than those older than 90 days. Managed care enrollment had no association with the work-up or prophylaxis.

This study, the authors conclude, shows a common finding—inadequate compliance with recommended guidelines. Less than one half of the children studied received recommended care. Hospitalized children were more likely to receive recommended care, possibly because coordination of care was easier, children were more acutely ill, testing could be completed during hospitalization, or clinical pathways mandated care. Further evidence-based studies on UTI work-up and better implementation of guidelines are warranted.

Cohen AL, et al. Compliance with guidelines for the medical care of first urinary tract infections in infants: a population-based study Pediatrics. June 2005;115:1474–8.

editor's note: In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a practice parameter1 on evaluation of first-time urinary tract infection (UTI) in children age two months to two years, and these guidelines still stand. Since then, the literature has been expanded with similar recommendations for neonates, and continues to support the concomitant use of voiding cystourethrography for the detection of reflux and renal ultrasonography.2,3 A few dissenting voices have argued that studies of imaging after first UTI have not altered management or demonstrated patient-oriented outcomes such as a reduction in recurrent UTI and renal scarring.4c.w.



show all references

1. Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Quality Improvement. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection [published corrections appear in Pediatrics 1999;103:1052, 1999;104:118, and 2000;105:141] Pediatrics. 1999;103(4 pt 1):84352....

2. Goldman M, Lahat E, Strauss S, Reisler G, Livne A, Gordin L, et al. Imaging after urinary tract infection in male neonates Pediatrics. 2000;105:1232–5.

3. Giorgi LJ Jr, Bratslavksy G, Kogan BA. Febrile urinary tract infections in infants: renal ultrasound remains necessary J Urol. 2005;173:568–70.

4. Hoberman A, Charron M, Hickey RW, Baskin M, Kearney DH, Wald ER. Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children N Engl J Med. 2003;348:195–202.



Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Jan 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article