Graham Center One-Pager

Decreasing Self-Perceived Health Status Despite Rising Health Expenditures


Am Fam Physician. 2009 Sep 1;80(5):427.

Despite steady increases in U.S. health care spending, the population's self-perceived health status has been in a long-term decline. Increased support for public health, prevention, and primary care could reduce growth in spending and improve actual and perceived health.

Self-perceived health status is a subjective measure of personal health that correlates with having a chronic disease or risk factors for bad health, and with morbidity and early mortality risk. From 1993 to 2007, the proportion of adults younger than 65 years reporting excellent or very good health steadily declined from 64 to 56 percent (Figure 1).1 During this time, the U.S. population aged and the proportion of minorities (i.e., blacks and Hispanics) increased. Controlling for these two trends does not explain the decline in health status. Also during this time, health spending per capita more than doubled, increasing from $3,468 to $7,421 (Figure 2).2 Despite this rise in spending, U.S. population health fell even further behind the performance of most other developed nations.

View/Print Figure

Figure 1.

Percentage of U.S. patients whose self-perceived health status was “excellent” or “very good” (1993–2007).1

Figure 1.

Percentage of U.S. patients whose self-perceived health status was “excellent” or “very good” (1993–2007).1

View/Print Figure

Figure 2.

U.S. health spending per capita (in 2007 dollars) from 1993 to 2007.2

Figure 2.

U.S. health spending per capita (in 2007 dollars) from 1993 to 2007.2

Continuing to spend more on our fragmented health care system is unlikely to change the pattern of high expenditures and suboptimal health. Countries that invest in comprehensive primary care systems have better health outcomes, patient satisfaction, and uptake of preventive services, and lower mortality.3 Most spend less per capita than the United States and still achieve superior outcomes.3,4 Focusing on other health determinants (e.g., education, poverty reduction) and reorganizing health spending around public health, prevention, and primary care are likely to improve health at a lower societal cost.

note: The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.

One-Pagers are available from the Graham Center at The Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (telephone: 202-331-3360; fax: 202-331-3374; e-mail:


show all references

1. CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data and documentation. Accessed May 19, 2009....

2. CMS. National health expenditure. Accessed May 19, 2009.

3. van LerbergheW. The world health report 2008: primary health care: now more than ever. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.

4. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502.



Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

Editor's Collections

More in Pubmed


Jan 15, 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article