Physician Assessment of COPD Does Not Match Spirometry Results


Am Fam Physician. 2015 Oct 1;92(7):635a-640.

Clinical Question

How accurate are physician assessments of the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?

Bottom Line

Using immediate, in-office spirometry results as the reference standard, seasoned physicians accurately identified COPD severity in approximately one in three patients, underestimating severity in 41% of patients and overestimating severity in 29% of patients. This mismatch seems to be important because the physicians participating in this study changed their treatment plans for 37% of patients after reviewing the spirometry results. A second issue in this study: Although most of the physicians in the study had a spirometer in their office, they (or their staff) were unable to get usable spirometry results in 25% of their patients. (Level of Evidence = 1c)


The study included 899 patients with COPD who were randomly selected from the practices of 83 primary care physicians (63% family physicians and 37% general internists). The physicians had been in practice an average of 22 years and most had in-office spirometry available before this study. At one visit, both the physician and the patient rated the patient's pulmonary disease severity at that time on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 (no clinical symptoms or disease impact/mild symptoms) to 5 (very severe). Following this assessment, the patient immediately underwent in-office spirometry, although only 75% were able to produce at least one high-quality result. Overall, there was poor correlation among physician assessment, patient assessment, and spirometry results. Physicians underestimated severity in 41% of patients and overestimated severity in 29% of patients, using the spirometry results as the reference standard. Correlation was not much better with the patients' own estimates, with physicians underestimating severity in 42% of patients and overestimating severity in 18% compared with patients' self-assessments. Overall, physician ratings were accurate for only 30% of patients. More importantly, the physicians in this study recommended treatment changes for 37% of patients after reviewing spirometry results.

Study design: Cross-sectional

Funding source: Industry

Setting: Outpatient (primary care)

Reference: Mapel DW, Dalal AA, Johnson P, Becker L, Hunter AG. A clinical study of COPD severity assessment by primary care physicians and their patients compared with spirometry. Am J Med. 2015; 128( 6): 629– 637.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by EssentialEvidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, please see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP,search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, Associate Medical Editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.



Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

Editor's Collections

Related Content

More in Pubmed


May 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article