Letters to the Editor

Additional Protection from 9-Valent HPV Vaccine if Administered Before HPV Exposure


Am Fam Physician. 2016 Feb 15;93(4):254-256.

Original Article: 9-Valent HPV Vaccine Offers Only Small Advantage Over Quadrivalent Vaccine [POEMs]

Issue Date: July 1, 2015

See additional reader comments at: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2015/0701/p54.html

to the editor: Dr. Ebell's review of the study by Joura and colleagues1 asserts that the 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine offers only a small advantage over the quadrivalent vaccine. He bases this on his assessment of data presented for the modified intention-to-treat population that includes persons who were already infected before vaccination.

HPV vaccines are prophylactic (i.e., they prevent HPV infection in persons who have not been exposed to the virus). They have no impact on HPV infections acquired before vaccination. Thus, an intention-to-treat analysis, which includes persons infected with HPV before vaccination, is not a suitable evaluation of prophylactic efficacy.2 Prophylactic efficacy is assessed in the per-protocol population, which approximates a susceptible population of HPV-naïve individuals.

The per-protocol analysis showed that vaccine effectiveness against disease caused by the additional HPV types in the 9-valent vaccine was 96.7% (95% confidence interval, 80.9 to 99.8).1 Based on these results, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has included the 9-valent HPV vaccine in its recommended routine HPV vaccinations for girls and boys 11 and 12 years of age, and catch-up vaccination of girls and women 13 to 26 years of age and boys and men 13 to 21 years of age who have not been vaccinated previously.3 The introduction of 9-valent HPV vaccination in both males and females was cost-saving compared with the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in cost-effectiveness analyses.3

From these results, we can conclude that the 9-valent HPV vaccine represents a meaningful advantage over existing HPV vaccines. This added protection against infection and disease caused by HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 offers the potential to prevent an additional 30% to 35% more high-grade cervical lesions4 and to increase cervical cancer prevention from approximately 70% to 90%.4,5 Early vaccination before HPV exposure is key to derive the optimal benefit. Health care professionals should vaccinate all eligible 11- to 12-year-old patients using every appropriate opportunity, because these preadolescents are much less likely to have been exposed to HPV than are older adolescents. In addition, clinicians should vaccinate older patients who have not been previously vaccinated according to the ACIP recommendations for these catch-up cohorts.

Author disclosure: Dr. Joura reports receiving fees for serving on an advisory board from Merck and Sanofi Pasteur MSD, lecture fees from Merck and Sanofi Pasteur MSD and from Roche, and grant support from Merck and GlaxoSmithKline. Drs. Clark and Luxembourg are employees of Merck & Co., Inc.


show all references

1. Joura EA, Giuliano AR, Iversen OE, et al.; Broad Spectrum HPV Vaccine Study. A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):711–723....

2. Joura E, Bautista O, Luxembourg A. A 9-valent HPV vaccine in women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2568–2569.

3. Petrosky E, Bocchini JA Jr, Hariri S, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPV vaccination recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(11):300–304.

4. Joura EA, Ault KA, Bosch FX, et al. Attribution of 12 high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes to infection and cervical disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):1997–2008.

5. Serrano B, de Sanjosé S, Tous S, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution for HPVs 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 in female anogenital lesions. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(13):1732–1741.

in reply: I do not dispute the results of the per-protocol analysis. I acknowledged in my review that among uninfected women, there is a statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of HPV infection, but that this is relatively small (number needed to treat = 160 for three years to prevent one high-grade lesion). The per-protocol analysis that is emphasized by Dr. Joura provides the most optimistic estimate of benefit and does not reflect what would happen in primary care practice, where physicians do not typically check for evidence of previous HPV exposure before beginning a series of immunizations. As I stated, the 9-valent HPV vaccine provides an overall benefit, but it is modest. Fortunately, the cost of these two immunizations is fairly similar. It is also important to note that the ACIP recommends a ceiling age of 21 years for men and 26 years for women for catch-up immunization.1

Author disclosure: Dr. Ebell is cofounder and editor-in-chief of Essential Evidence Plus, published by Wiley-Blackwell, Inc.


1. Petrosky E, Bocchini JA Jr, Hariri S, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPV vaccination recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(1):300–304.

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.



Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Jan 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article