Cochrane for Clinicians
Putting Evidence into Practice
Pilates for the Treatment of Low Back Pain
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Apr 1;93(7):556-557.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Are Pilates exercises effective for patients with low back pain?
There is low- to moderate-quality evidence that Pilates exercises taught by certified instructors improve pain and reduce disability in patients with chronic low back pain. It is unclear whether a Pilates regimen is superior to other exercise plans for the treatment of low back pain. Adverse effects are uncommon. (Strength of Recommendation: B, based on inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence.)
Up to 40% of patients with acute low back pain will not have resolution of pain in the first three months, and more than one-half of these patients will have residual pain after one year.1 No systematic review has concluded which, if any, of the commonly suggested exercise regimens—including yoga, tai chi, and McKenzie method regimens—is best for treating patients with chronic low back pain. Once known as “centrology,” the Pilates method was originally developed in the 1920s by Joseph Pilates. It is based on the principles of centering (i.e., toning the core trunk muscles), concentration (i.e., being attentive to movements), control (i.e., maintaining posture), precision (i.e., being accurate in techniques), flow (i.e., making a smooth transition between movements), and coordinated breathing. The authors of this review sought to determine whether this intervention is effective in treating patients with nonspecific low back pain.
This Cochrane review included 10 randomized controlled trials and 478 patients, all 16 years or older. Treatments were supervised by trained or certified Pilates instructors and were carried out from once a day to once a week. All training sessions were approximately one hour long, and treatment programs lasted from 10 to 90 days. Six trials compared Pilates with minimal or no intervention, using a zero (no pain) to 100 rating scale to determine benefit. All of the included trials focused on patients with chronic back pain. Adverse effects were rarely reported; when they occurred, they were mostly mild muscle pain that did not cause patients to discontinue treatment. No trials reported outcomes beyond 12 months from the onset of treatment.
Meta-analysis of low- and moderate-quality evidence demonstrated that Pilates therapy provided pain relief during the first three months (mean difference [MD] = −14.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], −18.91 to −9.19) as well as up to one year after treatment began (MD = −10.54; 95% CI, −18.46 to −2.62) when compared with minimal or no intervention. These improvements are based on a 100-point scale, and this would be considered a clinically significant or noticeable benefit. Each of the individual trials had outcomes favoring Pilates. With regard to reducing disability, meta-analysis found that Pilates was superior in the short term (MD = −7.95; 95% CI, −13.23 to −2.67) and the intermediate term (MD = −11.17; 95% CI, −18.41 to −3.92). These differences are of marginal clinical significance. Only one trial with 86 participants reported on the outcomes of improved function and global impression of recovery. Although it demonstrated statistically significant improvements over the short term, longer-term outcomes were not considered statistically or clinically significant.
Four trials compared Pilates with other exercise regimens, although only three of the trials could be included in the meta-analysis. The comparisons were general exercise or a stationary bicycling program. The evidence was considered low quality, and the outcomes in the studies were not consistent in determining whether Pilates is superior at improving pain. With regard to improving disability, there was moderate-quality evidence that Pilates is no better than other exercise regimens.
The conclusion that Pilates is beneficial in the short and intermediate term for relief of pain and disability is consistent with the findings of other recent systematic reviews.2,3 Although they do not specify one type of exercise regimen over another, current guidelines suggest that all patients with chronic pain participate in some form of exercise therapy to improve function and fitness.4 Patients can find Pilates instruction from many resources, including free introductory videos available online. One such source is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuv3kOp2wLI.
The practice recommendations in this activity are available at http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD010265.
Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT, et al. Pilates for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD010265.
REFERENCESshow all references
1. Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):e613–e624....
2. Wells C, Kolt GS, Marshall P, Hill B, Bialocerkowski A. The effectiveness of Pilates exercise in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. PloS One. 2014;9(7):e100402.
3. Lim EC, Poh RL, Low AY, Wong WP. Effects of Pilates-based exercises on pain and disability in individuals with persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(2):70–80.
4. Hooten WM, Timming R, Belgrade M, et al. Assessment and management of chronic pain. Bloomington, Minn.: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2013.
These are summaries of reviews from the Cochrane Library.
This series is coordinated by Corey D. Fogleman, MD, Assistant Medical Editor.
A collection of Cochrane for Clinicians published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/cochrane.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue of American Family Physician