FPIN's Help Desk Answers

History and Physical Examination for Identifying Rotator Cuff Tears


Am Fam Physician. 2017 Nov 1;96(9):online.

Clinical Question

Which history and physical examination findings are most useful for identifying full-thickness rotator cuff tears?

Evidence-Based Answer

There are no historical features that reliably identify full-thickness rotator cuff tears. The physical examination maneuvers that best identify the presence of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear are the internal rotation lag test, the external rotation lag test, and a positive “belly-off” sign. The best maneuver to help confirm the absence of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the subscapularis is a negative internal rotation lag test. (Strength of Recommendation: B, based on a meta-analysis of heterogeneous diagnostic cohort studies and a single diagnostic cohort study.)

Evidence Summary

A 2013 meta-analysis of five high-quality diagnostic cohort trials (N = 432) examined findings from the history and/or physical examination in patients referred to orthopedists for suspected rotator cuff disease.1 The trials detailed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and used surgery, ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard with prespecified diagnostic criteria. No historical findings were helpful in identifying rotator cuff tears. The physical examination maneuver with the greatest positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for any full-thickness rotator cuff tear was the external rotation lag test (LR+ = 7.2); for subscapularis tears, the internal rotation lag test was the most useful (LR+ = 5.6). The internal rotation lag test was associated with the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.04) for subscapularis tears.

A diagnostic cohort study examined the diagnostic validity of physical examination maneuvers in 139 patients with shoulder pain who were referred to two tertiary shoulder orthopedic practices.2 Arthroscopy was the reference standard in patients who underwent surgery, whereas magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography was used in nonsurgical patients. The external rotation lag test had the greatest likelihood of detecting full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus (LR+ = 7.8) and infraspinatus (LR+ = 6.3).

Researchers developed an algorithm to help diagnose rotator cuff tears.3 In patients older than 50 years with a positive “belly-off” sign, external rotation lag test, or weak abduction, a rotator cuff tear should be suspected and magnetic resonance imaging considered. Patients in this study had been referred for orthopedic surgery and may have a higher prevalence of rotator cuff tears than that seen in primary care settings.

Copyright Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Address correspondence to Carl V. Tyler Jr., MD, MSc, at catyle@ccf.org. Reprints are not available from the authors.


1. Hermans J, Luime JJ, Meuffels D, Reijman M, Simel DL, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Does this patient with shoulder pain have rotator cuff disease? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2013;310(8):837–847.

2. Somerville LE, Willits K, Johnson AM, et al. Clinical assessment of physical examination maneuvers for rotator cuff lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1911–1919.

3. O'Kane JW, Toresdahl BG. The evidenced-based shoulder evaluation. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014;13(5):307–313.

Help Desk Answers provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (http://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to http://www.fpin.org or e-mail: questions@fpin.org.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, Assistant Medical Editor.

A collection of FPIN's Help Desk Answers published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/hda.



Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

More in Pubmed


Sep 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article