Letters to the Editor

Acupuncture Is Ineffective for Treatment of Low Back Pain

 

Am Fam Physician. 2017 Dec 15;96(12):online.

Original Article: Complementary/Integrative Therapies That Work: A Review of the Evidence

Issue Date: September 1, 2016

See additional reader comments at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/0901/p369.html

to the editor: I was disappointed that in the case of acupuncture for chronic low back pain, the authors cited a narrow selection of the available literature: a few recent articles that suffered from being poorly interpreted or of poor quality.1 This gives the incorrect impression that acupuncture is an effective intervention for chronic low back pain, and led the authors to ascribe an A level of evidence and recommend as a first-line therapy an intervention that has no evidence of effectiveness compared with placebo, and very real risk of harm.15

The Vickers article cited by the authors is one meta-analysis of many on this subject. Another meta-analysis using similar inputs came to an opposite conclusion.1,5 Chronic low back pain is certainly a condition ripe for demonstrating false positives because of poor research design and/or bias, given that an approximately equal initial response to any therapy has been well demonstrated.1,2,6

I also dispute the authors' assertion that “In general, acupuncture is extremely safe, with the most common risk being transient mild discomfort.” The reality is quite different, as demonstrated in a 2011 review that failed to show any benefit from acupuncture and detailed the possible harms, including some deaths and other major adverse effects such as septic arthritis, spinal epidural abscess, retroperitoneal abscess, necrotizing fasciitis, and infectious aortic aneurysm.2

As a whole, the available evidence shows unequivocally that acupuncture is not an effective therapy for any condition.15 When an intervention has no evidence of effectiveness beyond placebo, no risk of harm—however small—justifies its use or recommendation by family physicians, especially for a condition that is well known to respond equally as well to any treatment offered.1,2,6

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

REFERENCES

show all references

1. Colquhoun D, Novella SP. Acupuncture is theatrical placebo. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(6):1360–1363....

2. Ernst E, Lee MS, Choi TY. Acupuncture: does it alleviate pain and are there serious risks? A review of reviews. Pain. 2011;152(4):755–764.

3. Haake M, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with three groups [published correction appears in Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(19):2072]. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1892–1898.

4. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, et al. A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):858–866.

5. Madsen MV, Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A. Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomized clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups. BMJ. 2009;338:a3115.

6. Artus M, van der Windt DA, Jordan KP, Hay EM. Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(12):2346–2356.

in reply: We thank Dr. Wright for his critique of our conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for low back pain.

Regarding effectiveness, it is often possible to find individual trials or systematic reviews that do not demonstrate benefit, even for well-established therapies. We based our recommendations on a preponderance of the most recent evidence, which strongly supports the effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic back pain. A recent review commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on noninvasive treatments for low back pain confirmed that there is moderate evidence of effectiveness for acupuncture.1 This level of effectiveness is equivalent to that for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and superior to that for long-term opioid therapy. A recent review from the National Institutes of Health also included acupuncture as an effective complementary and integrative treatment for pain management.2

Regarding safety, the 2011 review that Dr. Wright cited included multiple examples of case reports of adverse effects from acupuncture. Evidence on safety needs to be based on large-scale prospective surveys, not on single case reports. In one rigorous survey, 12 prospective studies of more than 1 million acupuncture treatments showed the risk of a serious adverse event to be 0.05 per 10,000 treatments, and 0.55 per 10,000 patients.3 Systematic reviews and surveys have clarified that acupuncture is safe when performed by appropriately trained practitioners.4,5 Every effective treatment, including acupuncture, has the potential for adverse effects. The proper approach is to evaluate the frequency of serious adverse events and balance this against the evidence of benefit. In the case of acupuncture for chronic low back pain, this risk-benefit analysis clearly favors including this approach on the list of potential therapies.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

REFERENCES

show all references

1. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. Noninvasive treatments for low back pain. AHRQ comparative effectiveness review 16-EHC004-EF. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016....

2. Nahin RL, Boineau R, Khalsa PS, Stussman BJ, Weber WJ. Evidence-based evaluation of complementary health approaches for pain management in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(9):1292–1306.

3. White A. A cumulative review of the range and incidence of significant adverse events associated with acupuncture. Acupunct Med. 2004;22(3):122–133.

4. Zhao XF, Du Y, Liu PG, Wang S. Acupuncture for stroke: evidence of effectiveness, safety, and cost from systematic reviews. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(3):226–233.

5. Bergqvist D. Vascular injuries caused by acupuncture. A systematic review. Int Angiol. 2013;32(1):1–8.

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.

 

 

Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP


Editor's Collections


Related Content


MOST RECENT ISSUE


Jul 15, 2018

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article