Immediate Postpartum LARC: An Underused Contraceptive Option
Am Fam Physician. 2018 Jan 1;97(1):9-10.
In the United States, use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants doubled between 2006 and 2012 to nearly 12% of women 15 to 44 years of age who were using contraception.1 However, opportunities exist to expand access to and use of these highly effective contraceptives. Provision of LARC in the immediate postpartum period may aid women in birth spacing and help avoid short interpregnancy intervals (i.e., less than six to 18 months), which are associated with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, and infants being small for gestational age.2
Offering immediate postpartum insertion of LARC is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,3 the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,4 the American Academy of Family Physicians,5 the American Academy of Pediatrics,6 and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.7 The provision of immediate postpartum LARC is safe for most women, including those who are breastfeeding, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.8 Although implants can be placed before discharge from the hospital, IUDs may be inserted within 10 minutes of placental delivery or intraoperatively prior to uterine closure after cesarean delivery.
A 2015 Cochrane review summarized the benefits of immediate postpartum IUD insertion based on data from four eligible randomized controlled trials that included 243 women.9 Women desiring an IUD who were randomized to immediate insertion were twice as likely to be using an IUD for contraception six months after delivery (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 4.09) compared with those who waited for routine six-week postpartum placement. Although women appeared to be more likely to receive an IUD in the immediate-placement group compared with those waiting six weeks, this estimate was imprecise (OR = 4.07; 95% CI, 0.54 to 30.40). Repeat pregnancies were rare, and the included studies did not evaluate pregnancy incidence with alternative contraceptive regimens compared with IUDs. Previous research demonstrates that LARC is superior to common shorter-acting contraceptive methods (e.g., pills, patches, rings) for pregnancy prevention.10
Women undergoing immediate insertion experienced a greater risk of IUD expulsion compared with those who had delayed insertion (19 out of 113 [17%] and three out of 97 [3%], respectively; OR = 4.89; 95% CI, 1.47 to 16.32), with the majority of women opting to have the device replaced. Harms (e.g., urogenital infections) were rare and similar in each group. Despite the increased expulsion rate, immediate postpartum IUD insertion is cost-saving until expulsion rates exceed 38%, and cost-effective (at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000) up to expulsion rates of 56%.11 These threshold expulsion rates are more than two to three times what was observed in the Cochrane review.
Postpartum follow-up rates observed in the individual randomized controlled trials were also far greater than in the real world. The studies report that 80% to 98% of women attended follow-up visits, although in actual practice in the United States, only 76% of commercially insured women and 62% of publicly insured women attend a postpartum visit.12 These different follow-up rates may underestimate the gains in pregnancy prevention with immediate postpartum LARC in real-world settings.
In April 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services encouraged state Medicaid programs to increase access to LARC and provide coverage for immediate postpartum LARC.7 However, as of December 2016, only 24 states offered coverage in the immediate postpartum period despite all Medicaid agencies covering LARC in the outpatient setting.13 The main barrier to offering immediate postpartum LARC involves lack of reimbursement for device and insertion costs that exceed the global delivery fee. Many state Medicaid programs and commercial insurers have developed their own reimbursement procedures, allowing hospitals and physicians to bill outside of the global delivery fee.14
Providing immediate postpartum LARC to women who want it is an evidence-based, patient-centered, and safe practice. It may also allow for increased efficiency at the postpartum visit by providing more time to address future pregnancy planning, reflect on changes to the mother's health or risks based on conditions identified during the recent pregnancy, screen for postpartum anxiety or depression, monitor breastfeeding, and assist women who are transitioning back to work. Greater evidence on training, best practices, and use is needed, presenting opportunities for future research.
Referencesshow all references
1. Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015;(86):1–14....
2. Bigelow CA, Bryant AS. Short interpregnancy intervals: an evidence-based guide for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70(7):458–464.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 6|18 Initiative. Evidence summary: prevent unintended pregnancy. http://www.cdc.gov/sixeighteen/pregnancy/index.htm. Accessed January 1, 2017.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Committee opinion no. 670. August 2016. http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/Immediate-Postpartum-Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception. Accessed January 1, 2017.
5. American Academy of Family Physicians. Coverage, patient education, and counseling for family planning, contraceptive methods, and sterilization procedures. http://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/family-planning.html. Accessed January 1, 2017.
6. Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1244–e1256.
7. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. State Medicaid payment approaches to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception. CMCS informational bulletin. April 8, 2016. https://www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/CIB040816.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2017.
8. Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(3):1–103.
9. Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD003036.
10. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1998–2007.
11. Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, Nayeri UA, Caughey AB, Werner EF. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(1):131–137.
12. National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of health care quality report. http://www.ncqa.org/report-cards/health-plans/state-of-health-care-quality. Accessed January 1, 2017.
13. Kaiser Family Foundation. Intrauterine devices (IUDS): access for women in the U.S. http://kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/intrauterine-devices-iuds-access-for-women-in-the-u-s/. Accessed January 1, 2017.
14. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Immediate postpartum LARC Medicaid Reimbursement. http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception/Immediate-Postpartum-LARC-Medicaid-Reimbursement. Accessed January 1, 2017.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue of American Family Physician