Shoulder Dystocia: Managing an Obstetric Emergency
Am Fam Physician. 2020 Jul 15;102(2):84-90.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency in which normal traction on the fetal head does not lead to delivery of the shoulders. This can cause neonatal brachial plexus injuries, hypoxia, and maternal trauma, including damage to the bladder, anal sphincter, and rectum, and postpartum hemorrhage. Although fetal macrosomia, prior shoulder dystocia, and preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk of shoulder dystocia, most cases occur without warning. Labor and delivery teams should always be prepared to recognize and treat this emergency. Training and simulation exercises improve physician and team performance when shoulder dystocia occurs. Unequivocally announcing that dystocia is happening, summoning extra assistance, keeping track of the time from delivery of the head to full delivery of the neonate, and communicating with the patient and health care team are helpful. Calm and thoughtful use of release maneuvers such as knee to chest (McRoberts maneuver), suprapubic pressure, posterior arm or shoulder delivery, and internal rotational maneuvers will almost always result in successful delivery. When these are unsuccessful, additional maneuvers, including intentional clavicular fracture or cephalic replacement, may lead to delivery. Each institution should consider the length of time it will take to prepare the operating room for general inhalational anesthesia and abdominal rescue and practice this during simulation exercises.
Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency in which gentle downward traction of the fetal head does not lead to delivery and additional maneuvers are required to deliver the fetal shoulders.1 Shoulder dystocia is usually attributed to impaction of the anterior shoulder against the maternal symphysis after delivery of the fetal head; less commonly, it is caused by impaction of the posterior shoulder against the sacral promontory.2
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
| Clinical recommendation | Evidence rating | Comments |
|---|---|---|
Conduct team training simulation drills that include identification to improve performance during actual shoulder dystocia emergencies.18 | B | Longitudinal study of a mandatory shoulder dystocia training program |
Announce unequivocally that there is a shoulder dystocia when it occurs.18 | B | Longitudinal study of a mandatory shoulder dystocia training program |
Elevate both knees to the chest (McRoberts maneuver) as the first therapeutic maneuver during shoulder dystocia.10 | B | Retrospective analysis of shoulder dystocia cases |
Consider posterior arm delivery if McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure are unsuccessful.10,14,21 | C | Clinical guidelines based on consensus, computer modeling, and a retrospective analysis of shoulder dystocia cases |
Document precisely the head-to-body delivery interval and maneuvers performed after every shoulder dystocia.10 | C | Consensus-based clinical guidelines |
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
| Clinical recommendation | Evidence rating | Comments |
|---|---|---|
Conduct team training simulation drills that include identification to improve performance during actual shoulder dystocia emergencies.18 | B | Longitudinal study of a mandatory shoulder dystocia training program |
Announce unequivocally that there is a shoulder dystocia when it occurs.18 | B | Longitudinal study of a mandatory shoulder dystocia training program |
Elevate both knees to the chest (McRoberts maneuver) as the first therapeutic maneuver during shoulder dystocia.10 | B | Retrospective analysis of shoulder dystocia cases |
Consider posterior arm delivery if McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure are unsuccessful.10,14,21 | C | Clinical guidelines based on consensus, computer modeling, and a retrospective analysis of shoulder dystocia cases |
Document precisely the head-to-body delivery interval and maneuvers performed after every shoulder dystocia.10 | C | Consensus-based clinical guidelines |
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.
Shoulder dystocia complicates 0.3% to 3% of all vaginal deliveries.3,4 The exact incidence can be difficult to determine because the diagnosis is subjective and there are no agreed upon diagnostic criteria for shoulder dystocia. Objective criteria of a head-to-body delivery interval of 60 seconds or the need for additional delivery maneuvers are proposed based on the incidence of significantly more birth injuries and lower Apgar scores during these deliveries.5
Risk Factors
References
show all references1. Resnik R. Management of shoulder girdle dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(2):559–564....
2. Hankins GD, Clark SL. Brachial plexus palsy involving the posterior shoulder at spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(1):44–45.
3. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, et al. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):657–672.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2014.
5. Beall MH, Spong C, McKay J, et al. Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(4):934–937.
6. Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, et al. Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(5):1225–1229.
7. Bingham J, Chauhan SP, Hayes E, et al. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65(3):183–188.
8. Zhang C, Wu Y, Li S, et al. Maternal prepregnancy obesity and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(4):407–413.
9. Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB. Shoulder dystocia: are historic risk factors reliable predictors? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):1933–1935.
10. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e123–e133.
11. Gupta M, Hockley C, Quigley MA, et al. Antenatal and intrapartum prediction of shoulder dystocia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):134–139.
12. Ouzounian JG, Korst LM, Miller DA, et al. Brachial plexus palsy and shoulder dystocia: obstetric risk factors remain elusive. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(4):303–307.
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin number 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e195–e209.
14. Shields SG, Ratcliffe S. Chapter F: labor dystocia. In: Leeman L, Quinlan JD, Dresang LT, et al. Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics Provider Manual. 8th edition. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2017:1–14.
15. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Souter I, et al. The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: how successful is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(3):656–661.
16. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(6):1126–1130.
17. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, et al. Spontaneous vaginal delivery: a risk factor for Erb's palsy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(3):423–427.
18. Grobman WA, Miller D, Burke C, et al. Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):513–517.
19. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia (green-top guideline No. 42). March 28, 2012. Updated February 2017. Accessed March 11, 2020. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg42/
20. Sturzenegger K, Schäffer L, Zimmermann R, et al. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(3):309–313.
21. Leung TY, Stuart O, Suen SS, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG. 2011;118(8):985–990.
22. Grimm MJ, Costello RE, Gonik B. Effect of clinician-applied maneuvers on brachial plexus stretch during a shoulder dystocia event: investigation using a computer simulation model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):339.e1–339.e5.
23. Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70(5):354–362.
24. Menticoglou SM. A modified technique to deliver the posterior arm in severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 pt 2):755–757.
25. Cluver CA, Hofmeyr GJ. Posterior axilla sling traction for shoulder dystocia: case review and a new method of shoulder rotation with the sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):784.e1–784.e7.
26. Bruner JP, Drummond SB, Meenan AL, et al. All-fours maneuver for reducing shoulder dystocia during labor. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(5):439–443.
27. O'Shaughnessy MJ. Hysterotomy facilitation of the vaginal delivery of the posterior arm in a case of severe shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(4 pt 2):693–695.
28. Sandberg EC. The Zavanelli maneuver: 12 years of recorded experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(2):312–317.
29. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient safety checklist no. 6: documenting shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 pt 1):430–431.
30. Baxley EG, Gobbo RW. Shoulder dystocia. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(7):1707–1714. Accessed March 11, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0401/p1707.html
Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact
afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
Editor's Collections
Related Content
More in Pubmed
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Email Alerts
Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.
