Practice Guidelines

Colorectal Cancer Screening: BMJ Rapid Recommendation

 

Am Fam Physician. 2020 Aug 15;102(4):253-254.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Key Points for Practice

• The BMJ/MAGIC Group recommends no screening for individuals with an estimated 15-year risk of CRC less than 3%.

• Colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, annual FIT, and biennial FIT similarly reduce CRC mortality.

• A key difference between recommended CRC screening methods is the probability of colonoscopy, which introduces risks of cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and perforation.

From the AFP Editors

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer with 65% overall five-year survival. CRC incidence increases by 0.5% to 1.5% every five years after 50 years of age. Because removal of adenomas can prevent cancer and earlier stage survival is higher, screening can reduce cancer incidence and mortality. CRC screening recommendations vary because the underlying evidence is low quality, with few screening methods evaluated by randomized trials. The BMJ/MAGIC Group performed a systematic review based on 15-year CRC risk models to compare screening options.

Recommendations apply to average-risk asymptomatic adults 50 to 79 years of age with at least 15 years of life expectancy. Recommendations do not apply to people with a history of polyps, CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary syndromes that increase CRC risk.

Estimating Colorectal Cancer Risk

The BMJ/MAGIC Group recommends calculating estimated CRC risk and avoiding screening for low-risk patients. Several risk estimate calculators have been developed, but the QCancer calculator (https://qcancer.org/15yr/colorectal/) is recommended based on proven accuracy, use of routinely available information, and 15-year risk estimation. QCancer has not been validated in U.S. patients. If estimated 15-year risk is less than 3%, no screening is recommended because CRC mortality approximates risks of cardiovascular events, serious bleeding, and colon perforation from screening.

Comparing Screening Methods

MORTALITY

Systematic review demonstrates similar reductions in 15-year CRC mortality for four screening options, although evidence for all-cause mortality is lacking. Reductions in 15-year CRC mortality compared with no screening are 63% with colonoscopy, 59% with annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), 52% for flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 50% with biennial FIT. CRC mortality risks by QCancer risk and screening method are shown in Table 1.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 1.

Estimated Benefits and Risks of CRC Screening

CRC diagnosis and mortalityProbability of requiring colonoscopy

CRC mortality rate with screening methodProbability of diagnosing CRC with screening methodOne or moreTwo or more

2% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

0.6%

2%

Colonoscopy

0.2%

1.3%

100%

7%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.3%

1.4%

16%

6%

Annual FIT

0.3%

1.7%

30%

7%

Biennial FIT

0.3%

1.9%

20%

5%

3% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

0.9%

3%

Colonoscopy

0.3%

2%

100%

11%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.4%

2.2%

24%

9%

Annual FIT

0.3%

2.6%

35%

10%

Biennial FIT

0.4%

2.9%

25%

8%

4% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

1.3%

4%

Colonoscopy

0.5%

2.6%

100%

14%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.6%

2.9%

31%

12%

Annual FIT

0.6%

3.4%

39%

14%

Biennial FIT

0.7%

3.8%

29%

11%


Note: Estimated cancer risk is based on the QCancer tool.

CRC = colorectal cancer; FIT = fecal immunochemical testing.

TABLE 1.

Estimated Benefits and Risks of CRC Screening

CRC diagnosis and mortalityProbability of requiring colonoscopy

CRC mortality rate with screening methodProbability of diagnosing CRC with screening methodOne or moreTwo or more

2% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

0.6%

2%

Colonoscopy

0.2%

1.3%

100%

7%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.3%

1.4%

16%

6%

Annual FIT

0.3%

1.7%

30%

7%

Biennial FIT

0.3%

1.9%

20%

5%

3% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

0.9%

3%

Colonoscopy

0.3%

2%

100%

11%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.4%

2.2%

24%

9%

Annual FIT

0.3%

2.6%

35%

10%

Biennial FIT

0.4%

2.9%

25%

8%

4% estimated 15-year CRC risk

No screening

1.3%

4%

Colonoscopy

0.5%

2.6%

100%

14%

Sigmoidoscopy

0.6%

2.9%

31%

12%

Annual FIT

0.6%

3.4%

39%

14%

Biennial FIT

0.7%

3.8%

29%

11%


Note: Estimated cancer risk is based on the QCancer tool.

CRC = colorectal cancer; FIT = fecal immunochemical testing.

INCIDENCE

CRC screening also reduces the incidence of CRC through removal of premalignant adenomas, a benefit that varies between screening methods. Direct visualization reduces CRC incidence the most, with a 34% reduction from colonoscopy and 27% from sigmoidoscopy. With FIT, the reductions are much less: only 15% with annual FIT and 5% with biennial FIT. Although two more recent flexible sigmoidoscopy studies showed greater CRC reduction in men, absolute differences are too small to change recommendations. Risks of CRC incidence by QCancer risk and screening method are shown in Table 1.

HARM HIGHER WITH COLONOSCOPY

Harms of CRC screening are primarily from colonoscopy. Risks include colon perforation, bleeding, other gastrointestinal issues, and cardiovascular events from sedation. The BMJ/MAGIC Group estimated the probability of requiring colonoscopy with each screening method, as shown in Table 1.

Patient Counseling

Because of similar effects on CRC mortality,

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Coverage of guidelines from other organizations does not imply endorsement by AFP or the AAFP.

This series is coordinated by Michael J. Arnold, MD, contributing editor.

A collection of Practice Guidelines published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/practguide.

 

 

Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

CME Quiz

More in AFP


Editor's Collections


Related Content


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Oct 15, 2020

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article