Letters to the Editor

Blood Transfusion Decisions in Adults with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

 

Am Fam Physician. 2021 Jan 15;103(2):68-69.

Original Article: Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults: Evaluation and Management

Issue Date: March 1, 2020

Available at: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2020/0301/p294.html

To the Editor: The article by Dr. Wilkins and colleagues comprehensively addressed this important topic. However, the section on blood transfusions is not consistent with the latest guidelines and does not address some important considerations. The article states that the threshold for blood transfusion should be 7 g per dL (70 g per L) unless there is ischemic heart disease, recent cardiac surgery, or hematologic malignancies (in which case the threshold is 8 g per dL [80 g per L]) based on the 2010 International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.1 However, a 2019 update of the guideline recommends a threshold of 8 g per dL for all patients.2 In addition, the guideline goes on to note that “the threshold recommendation does not apply to patients with exsanguinating bleeding. In the setting of acute blood loss, hemoglobin values may initially remain unchanged from baseline because of plasma equilibrium times. In such situations, transfusion should not be dictated by current hemoglobin level alone but should take into account the predicted drop in hemoglobin and the patient's clinical status.”

In the two trials that comprise nearly all of the data supporting the 2019 recommendation, exsanguinating bleeding was either not defined3 or included patients with shock (a systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg or pulse greater than 100 beats per minute) who were transfused within two hours of arrival in the emergency department.4 Even if the bleeding has stopped, equilibration will almost certainly bring the hemoglobin to less than 8 g per dL even before the effects of hemodilution with crystalloids, which would be necessary to try to achieve hemodynamic stability. In such a situation, clinical judgment is critical, and in our view, opting to immediately transfuse such a patient is a reasonable choice. However, crystalloids should be started while waiting for the type and crossmatch to be done.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

References

show all references

1. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al.; International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(2):101–113....

2. Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: guideline recommendations from the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(11):805–822.

3. Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2013;368(24):2341]. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):11–21.

4. Jairath V, Kahan BC, Gray A, et al. Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (TRIGGER): a pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised feasibility trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9989): 137–144.

In Reply: Thank you for your thoughtful response to our article. Our article referenced the 2010 consensus recommendations regarding transfusions in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.1 We completed the final literature search for our article in November 2019. The 2010 consensus statement reports that the blood transfusion threshold should be 7 g per dL. The transfusion threshold is 8 g per dL in patients with ischemic heart disease, recent cardiac surgery, or hematologic malignancies. Drs. Ehrlich and Trow's letter to the editor referenced the consensus guidelines published in December 2019.2 The 2019 consensus statement reports the new transfusion threshold of 8 g per dL for all patients. We agree with Drs. Ehrlich and Trow that the hemoglobin may lag in patients with ongoing and life-threatening upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Transfusion decisions in these situations must be individualized based on comorbidities, rate of bleeding, and clinical judgment.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

References

1. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al.; International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(2):101–113.

2. Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, et al. Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: guideline recommendations from the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(11):805–822.

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.

 

 

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Mar 1, 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article