Letters to the Editor
Symphysiotomy for Shoulder Dystocia
Am Fam Physician. 2021 Feb 1;103(3):136-137.
Original Article: Shoulder Dystocia: Managing an Obstetric Emergency
Issue Date: July 15, 2020
See additional reader comments at: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2020/0715/p84.html
To the Editor: I read Dr. Hill and colleagues' excellent review on shoulder dystocia with particular interest, remembering a terrifying experience early in my career attending the delivery of a patient who was short, morbidly obese, primiparous, and who had type 2 diabetes mellitus. At the time, I worked in a 40-bed rural hospital in the Smoky Mountains, and the blizzard of 1982 was occurring. I attempted to manage shoulder dystocia using the HELPERR mnemonic from an American Academy of Family Physicians Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics course.1 None of the maneuvers worked, and the baby's heart rate dropped to 20.
Our general surgeon arrived despite deep snowdrifts; however, the surgery suites were without electricity, and our anesthetist could not get in. “Section here with local and conscious sedation?” I asked. The surgeon shook his head. “No time! Ever done a symphysiotomy?” I had not. “No better time than now to learn.” He guided me through my first and only symphysiotomy, which I have described elsewhere.2 The procedure was easy to perform and instantly successful (as was the neonatal resuscitation).
Symphysiotomy does not require an operating room or advanced surgical skills. Infiltrating the skin and the subcutaneous and fibrocartilaginous tissues of the symphysis pubis with local anesthetic allows an incision through the symphysis. This allows instant modest separation of the pubic bones, which increases the size of the pelvic outlet to allow vaginal delivery.3–5 One review of the procedure states, “Although effective, we recommend avoiding symphysiotomy unless all other maneuvers have failed, and cesarean delivery is not possible.”3
According to a Cochrane review of symphysiotomy for fetopelvic disproportion, “Criticism of the operation because of complications, particularly pelvic instability, and as being a ‘second-best’ option has resulted in its decline or disappearance from use in many countries.” However, “several large observational studies have reported high rates of success, low rates of complications, and very low mortality rates.” 4 A meta-analysis of seven studies (n = 1,266) from low- to middle-income countries compared symphysiotomy with cesarean and found no differences in maternal or perinatal mortality.6
Complications are rare, and “long-term complications after symphysiotomy do not differ notably from those after cesarean section for similar indications.” 4–6 A potential advantage is that “the modest permanent enlargement of the pelvis post symphysiotomy, together with the absence of a scarred uterus, may facilitate subsequent vaginal delivery.”5 More importantly, “If there is no other available option, symphysiotomy may be lifesaving for the baby, the mother, or both.” 4 Health care professionals attending deliveries should be aware of this option for shoulder dystocia. I'm glad my consultant was.
Editor's Note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Shoulder Dystocia: Managing an Obstetric Emergency,” who declined to reply.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Referencesshow all references
1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Advanced life support in obstetrics (ALSO). Accessed August 11, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/cme/programs/also.html...
2. Larimore WL. Bryson City Seasons: More Tales of a Doctor's Practice in the Smoky Mountains. Zondervan. 2004:161–172.
3. Rodis JF. Shoulder dystocia: intrapartum diagnosis, management, and outcome. UpToDate. Updated October 22, 2019. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/shoulder-dystocia-intrapartum-diagnosis-management-and-outcome
4. Hofmeyr GJ, Shweni PM. Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10(10):CD005299.
5. Ersdal HL, Verkuyl DAA, Björklund K, et al. Symphysiotomy in Zimbabwe; postoperative outcome, width of the symphysis joint, and knowledge, attitudes and practice among doctors and midwives. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3317.
6. Wilson A, Truchanowicz EG, Elmoghazy D, et al. Symphysiotomy for obstructed labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123(9):1453–1461.
Send letters to email@example.com, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions