Editorials

Promoting Safety in Community-Based Birth Settings

 

Am Fam Physician. 2021 Jun 1;103(11):650-652.

Related article: Out-of-Hospital Birth

Births outside of the hospital setting are uncommon in the United States; however, since 2004, home birth rates have increased by 77%, and rates at community birth centers have doubled.1 Although controversy regarding the safety of giving birth outside of the hospital setting continues, professional organizations agree that a pregnant person has the inherent right to choose where they wish to give birth.24 Although studies of home birth outcomes in the United States have demonstrated increased perinatal mortality,5,6 data from other high-resource countries have been more reassuring.79 These differences in perinatal outcomes may be due to a variety of factors, including inconsistent training standards for U.S. midwives, higher-risk patients giving birth in U.S. community-based settings,10 and poor integration between U.S. community-and hospital-based maternity care services. Family physicians can improve perinatal outcomes for births at home and in community birth centers by facilitating access to physician consultation before, during, and after the birthing process.

Several prominent news outlets have reported increased interest in home births during the COVID-19 pandemic because many pregnant patients are afraid of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital.11,12 In response to these concerns, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American College of Nurse-Midwives, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine released a joint statement asserting that hospitals and community birth centers, with the appropriate accreditation, are the safest places to give birth in the United States.13

Home births are associated with lower rates of obstetric interventions, including cesarean delivery, oxytocin augmentation, and episiotomy, and with lower rates of obstetric complications such as anal sphincter lacerations and maternal infections.14 Psychological trauma from previous birth experiences and/or a history of other traumatic life experiences may cause a pregnant person to fear maltreatment or loss of autonomy if they give birth in a hospital. Mistreatment in labor occurs more often in the hospital setting compared with home births (28.1% vs. 5.1%).15 Systemic racism and the stress it creates account for some of this difference.16,17 Birth centers supported by public funding such as Medicaid, which pays for more than 40% of all births, and a higher proportion of births for persons of color18 may achieve improved satisfaction with the birthing experience, lower rates of preterm births and cesarean deliveries, and lower costs for delivery.19

The safety of home or birth center birth can be improved by adequate birth attendant training, access to emergency obstetric care, and careful risk assessment throughout the prenatal and intrapartum periods. Certified professional midwives should be trained to international standards and licensed in every state as described in the article by Lang and colleagues in this issue of American Family Physician.20,21 Physician consultation can improve prenatal care, assist with risk assessment, and facilitate timely transfer to hospital care if indicated. Patients' experiences during prenatal care or hospital transfer may be adversely affected in some communities by the unwillingness of community- and hospital-based physicians and midwives to collaborate.22

The AAFP, in collaboration with other professional organizations representing obstetrics and gynecology, midwifery, pediatrics, and patients, participated in the national Home Birth Summits in 2011–2014, which led to the development of model transfer guidelines.23 These guidelines define the roles of community- and hospital-based midwives and physicians to improve perinatal outcomes and maternal birth experience. Physicians, midwives, and nurses should use terminology free of negative connotations. Describing a pregnant person as a “failed home birth,” for example, is depersonalizing and may be viewed as judgmental. Labeling certified midwives or certified professional midwives who are not nurses as “lay midwives” is inaccurate and inappropriate. Substituting the term “community birth” for “out-of-hospital birth” removes the assumption that hospital birthing is normative and is preferred.24

Pregnant patients with a fetus in breech presentation near term, a multiple gestation, or a previous cesarean delivery should be counseled that home birth is not recommended because of the increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.2,10,25 Many patients in rural areas lack access to trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), despite AAFP and ACOG efforts to support maternal choice.26,27 Persons deemed ineligible for maternity care in their local hospital because of a history of cesarean delivery may choose the increased risk of a local home birth rather than transfer care outside of their community.2628 Supporting the options of TOLAC in rural hospitals and planned vaginal breech delivery for those who meet criteria may decrease the likelihood of pregnant persons with these risk factors choosing home birth.

The proportion of pregnant persons who live in “maternity care deserts” is increasing as rural maternity care units, or entire hospitals, close.29 For some rural residents, a hospital birth may be preferred by the patient and/or their clinicians, but geographic isolation may limit access. The establishment of rural birth centers may improve maternal satisfaction and access to safe care for low-risk pregnancies, and decrease obstetric interventions. Education such as AAFP's Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics course30 is particularly important for midwives practicing in community birth settings, because they may encounter complications such as shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage remote from physician assistance.

Although few physicians in the United States attend community births, family physicians play an important role in improving the safety of community birthing by offering counseling on the choice of birth setting, consultation, and collaboration during prenatal care, and by facilitating the process of maternal or newborn transfer when necessary. We encourage family physicians to pursue professional training and education on community birth to support the shared goal of an empowered and safer birth for every pregnant person.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Address correspondence to Lawrence Leeman, MD, MPH, at lleeman@salud.unm.edu. Reprints are not available from the authors.

References

show all references

1. MacDorman MF, Declercq E. Trends and characteristics of United States out-of-hospital births 2004–2014: new information on risk status and access to care. Birth. 2016;43(2):116–124....

2. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 697: planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(4):e117–e122.

3. American College of Nurse-Midwives. Midwifery provision of home birth services: American College of Nurse-Midwives [published correction appears in J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(4):538]. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(1):127–133.

4. Watterberg K; Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Providing care for infants born at home. Pediatrics. 2020;145(5):e20200626.

5. Cheng YW, Snowden JM, King TL, et al. Selected perinatal outcomes associated with planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):325.e1–325.e8.

6. Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C, et al. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(1):17–27.

7. Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, et al.; Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400.

8. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1177–1184.

9. Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003–2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2009;36(3):180–189.

10. Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Brown J, et al. Perspectives on risk: assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States. Birth. 2017;44(3):209–221.

11. Ayres-Brown A. Illinois midwives face surge of interest in home birth during coronavirus pandemic. Chicago Tribune. April 22, 2020. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-coronavirus-midwives-pregnancy-home-birth-20200422-bi3wxbdgufgdhjlhv6bj2rgk6i-story.html

12. de Freytas-Tamura K. Pregnant and scared of ‘covid hospitals,’ they're giving birth at home. New York Times. April 21, 2020. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/nyregion/coronavirus-home-births.html

13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Nurse-Midwives, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Patient-centered care for pregnant patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. March 30, 2020. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.acog.org/en/News/News%20Releases/2020/03/Patient%20Centered%20Care%20for%20Pregnant%20Patients%20During%20the%20COVID%2019%20Pandemic

14. Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, et al. Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100319.

15. Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, et al.; GVtM-US Steering Council. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mis-treatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):77.

16. Rosenthal L, Lobel M. Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina women. Ethn Health. 2020;25(3):367–392.

17. Slaughter-Acey JC, Talley LM, Stevenson HC, et al. Personal versus group experiences of racism and risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age infant in African American women: a life course perspective. J Urban Health. 2019;96(2):181–192.

18. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(13):1–47.

19. Urban Institute, Health Management Associates, American Institutes for Research, Briljent. Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns Evaluation: Year 5 Project Synthesis. 2018. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/strongstart-snhancedprenatalcaremodels_evalrptyr4v1.pdf

20. Professional Midwives. CPMs: midwifery landscape and future directions. A set of briefing papers and recommendations from NACPM. October 2017. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.nacpm.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/4A-Certification-and-a-National-Credential.pdf

21. Lang G, Farnell EA IV, Quinlan JD. Out-of-hospital birth. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(11):672–679.

22. Vedam S, Leeman L, Cheyney M, et al. Transfer from planned home birth to hospital: improving interprofessional collaboration. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(6):624–634.

23. Home Birth Summit. Best practice guidelines: transfer from planned home birth to hospital. 2020. Accessed December 6, 2020. https://www.homebirthsummit.org/best-practice-transfer-guidelines/

24. Cheyney M, Bovbjerg ML, Leeman L, et al. Community versus out-of-hospital birth: what's in a name? J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64(1):9–11.

25. Cox KJ, Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, et al. Planned home VBAC in the United States, 2004–2009: outcomes, maternity care practices, and implications for shared decision making. Birth. 2015;42(4):299–308.

26. King VJ, Fontaine PL, Atwood LA, et al. Clinical practice guideline executive summary: labor after cesarean/planned vaginal birth after cesarean. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(1):80–81.

27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–e127.

28. Leeman LM, Beagle M, Espey E, et al. Diminishing availability of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in New Mexico hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 pt 1):242–247.

29. March of Dimes. Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the U.S. 2020 report. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.marchofdimes.org/materials/2020-Maternity-Care-Report-eng.pdf

30. Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) provider manual. 9th ed. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2020.

 

 

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

CME Quiz

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Oct 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article