Staff surveys tell more than patient surveys
Fam Pract Manag. 1998 Sep;5(8):10.
To the Editor:
In “Using Qualitative Self-Evaluation in Rating Physician Performance” (May 1998), the author emphasized the importance of performing patient surveys but not staff surveys to evaluate physician performance. I would argue that staff surveys are critical to any physician evaluation and that patient surveys of satisfaction with their physician are not only over-rated but probably useless.
In lay studies that have asked individuals to assign approval ratings to different professions, physicians in general have been rated lower than one would have expected. The interesting thing, though, is that individuals tend to exclude their own physicians from the low rankings.
In patient surveys that I have done, I have found this to hold true. Physician approval ratings fluctuate within a very narrow range. I attribute this to a “trust” factor. After patients have made the decision to commit their care to an individual physician, they place their trust in that physician. Because of this commitment of trust, patients will generally rate the physician in a reasonably consistent and favorable way. If patients cannot place their trust in the physician, they tend not to be patients of that physician.
Staff members, on the other hand, are much more objective on the strengths and weaknesses of the physicians they work with. They have had a chance to see us interact with many patients on many levels, and they are affected by our idiosyncrasies, and our egos. Staff satisfaction is essential to the success of any practice. As much as we might hate to admit it, staff members make generally good assessments on the quality and consistency of our practice.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
The Adolescent Health Consortium Project has clarified clinical preventive service recommendations for adolescents and young adults.
Here's how to succeed in the four performance categories of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System.