On physicians, PPMCs and profit
Fam Pract Manag. 1998 Nov-Dec;5(10):8.
To the Editor:
In “When a Physician Practice Management Company Comes Calling” (June 1998), the consultants made one message very obvious: There is no reason, consistent with the professional goals of family physicians, for a PPMC to buy a primary care office. As Nathan Kaufman said, “The problem is that after you pay expenses and legitimate compensation to the physicians, there's no money left over.”
Doctors must remember that in medicine, profit is the fuel; in business, profit is the goal. No PPMC or hospital will willingly allow a practice to lose money or provide less than a constant 15 percent return. Once the goals of the doctors and the owners clash, guess whose goal will be primary.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
To avoid a negative payment adjustment from Medicare in 2020, practices must achieve a MIPS final score of at least 15 points for the 2018 performance period. Here's how to meet this performance threshold.