Not-so incidental expenses
Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Feb;8(2):12.
To the Editor:
I received a letter the other day from an insurance company informing me it would not pay for office urinalysis because its “medical staff” decided that under the company’s reimbursement policy, the reagents, specimen cup, reporting form, gloves, hazardous-waste disposal and office personnel involved in this test were “incidental” and therefore worth nothing. If a dipstick urinalysis is incidental to an office visit, how about a hemoglobin, hematocrit – or even a CBC? There is no end to this slippery slope.
More and more, we’re seeing insurance companies and Medicare climbing into the driver’s seat. For years they’ve felt they have the right to call the tune because they pay the piper. But, like the ill-fated council members of Hamelin, they now want to call the tune and not pay the piper. Allowing insurance companies or Medicare to decide what they’ll pay and when they’ll pay it is like asking someone who owes you money how much he or she feels like paying. Try getting insurance coverage without paying exactly what they charge.
Several years ago the major HMOs garnered enormous profits by drastically cutting back payments to physicians and hospitals for medical care. Then they invested large amounts in buying medical practices. Now they’ve been quietly backing out of those investments since they’ve discovered that dismal payments from medical insurers like themselves have made it nearly impossible to run profitable group medical practices. They’ve discovered that insurance companies and Medicare have all but ruined the practice of medicine.
The revolt is long overdue. It’s time for us to take back our health care system.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to email@example.com. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
Maternal Immunization Task Force for Pregnant Women: A Call to Action
The current increase in hesitancy about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has created an environment that calls for physicians’ urgent commitment to discussing the evidence-based benefits of vaccination with pregnant women.
Keys to High-Quality, Low-Cost Care: Empanelment, Attribution, and Risk Stratiﬁcation
Understand attribution and alignment methodologies in value-based payment arrangements to know which patients are assigned to you. Use empanelment and risk stratification to better understand where to expend your practice's care management and care coordination resources.