A new direction
Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Nov-Dec;8(10):12.
To the Editor:
Unfortunately, “Is It Time to Reexamine Family Practice?” [September 2001, page 43] came too late for this 39-year-old former family physician.
After 10 successful years, I left practice because of demoralization due to managed care attitudes and policies, frustration over my patients’ changing mindset and genuine fear for my future security.
The PPO reimbursement in my area is atrocious, and our HMO payments are eaten up by the associated overhead expenses. When I left, eight employees in my office were doing work that wouldn’t have been necessary were it not for HMO rules.
The changing attitude among my patients was the largest disappointment. They came in less for my expert medical opinion than for referrals for an MRI or to other specialists. They paid less for their services and felt more entitled, and became less accountable for their own health in the process.
Lastly, I feared the marginalization of the family physician. I did 70 percent less than I was trained to do because of lack of time, patient pressures to see a specialist and lack of payment for my service. It became clear to me that I did little more than what a nurse practitioner or physician assistant could do. After coping with an overwhelming sense of loss, I decided to pursue another dream of mine in the pharmaceutical industry.
I admire those family physicians who have stayed to fight. But I believe the action plan is poorly aimed. The public needs to be educated about HMOs. They have enjoyed unopposed propaganda while we wage a time-consuming battle in our offices. The proposed patient bill of rights is grossly inadequate, and will result in a dramatic shift of wealth to the legal profession. The Academy needs to speak to family doctors on the front lines – not the ones quoted in the article with fancy titles who are paid by institutions.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to email@example.com. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
Maternal Immunization Task Force for Pregnant Women: A Call to Action
The current increase in hesitancy about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has created an environment that calls for physicians’ urgent commitment to discussing the evidence-based benefits of vaccination with pregnant women.
Keys to High-Quality, Low-Cost Care: Empanelment, Attribution, and Risk Stratiﬁcation
Understand attribution and alignment methodologies in value-based payment arrangements to know which patients are assigned to you. Use empanelment and risk stratification to better understand where to expend your practice's care management and care coordination resources.