Successful test-result tracking
Fam Pract Manag. 2003 Jan;10(1):12.
To the Editor:
When I had my own practice, we put the highest emphasis on tracking and informing patients of test results, as “Four Principles for Better Test-Result Tracking” [July/August 2002, page 41] recommends.
For every test, imaging study and specialty consultation ordered, we used simple, multipart forms to create a copy of the order for a tickler file. We organized the file according to when we expected the results back. When the reports arrived, we matched them with the form in the tickler file and destroyed the tickler form. Any unmatched forms meant there was a test result to track down.
I never liked the ambiguity of the “no news is good news” approach. Patients never knew whether “no news” meant the results were normal or the office had just forgotten to contact them. To solve this problem, we printed postcards with “Your recent tests were normal” on one side and our return address and a place for the patient’s address on the other side. We told patients that we would contact them once all their test results were back, and we had them address the postcard if they wanted one mailed. This gave us implied consent to send test results on a postcard. Patients were also given instructions to call if the postcard didn’t arrive by a particular date. We called patients whose test results were not normal.
These two systems worked exceedingly well. We never had a patient complain, and I feel confident that we never lost a test result.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
Maternal Immunization Task Force for Pregnant Women: A Call to Action
The current increase in hesitancy about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has created an environment that calls for physicians’ urgent commitment to discussing the evidence-based benefits of vaccination with pregnant women.
Keys to High-Quality, Low-Cost Care: Empanelment, Attribution, and Risk Stratiﬁcation
Understand attribution and alignment methodologies in value-based payment arrangements to know which patients are assigned to you. Use empanelment and risk stratification to better understand where to expend your practice's care management and care coordination resources.