Evaluating the efficiencies of technology
Fam Pract Manag. 2004 May;11(5):22.
To the Editor:
I have an engineering background and usually think that technology is terrific, but as “Rediscovering the Paper Planner” [March 2004, page 100] demonstrates, it has its limitations. I had a personal digital assistant (PDA) for a few years. It was a wonderful gadget – when it was working! I had to send it back for repairs twice and lost considerable data in the process. I have now gone back to a paper planner and am much more efficient. I am able to get to information much faster and enter it more quickly with the paper planner than with the PDA.
I believe that the same thing will occur with electronic medical records (EMRs). EMRs seem like the answer to everything, but we will all find out that they are actually costly and inefficient. As a solo physician in a rural area, I cannot afford to purchase and maintain an EMR system, and I cannot afford the extra time spent on record keeping. I would rather be caring for my patients. I believe that EMRs should not be mandated for everyone, but they should be a choice for those who have extra money and time. Technology is not always the best option for everyone.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to email@example.com. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
To avoid a negative payment adjustment from Medicare in 2020, practices must achieve a MIPS final score of at least 15 points for the 2018 performance period. Here's how to meet this performance threshold.