18 Glimpses of Tomorrow
The “big ideas” described in this issue offer 18 different views of the future, individually incomplete, but collectively suggestive of a shared vision.
Fam Pract Manag. 2004 Sep;11(8):13.
Naturally, before we called this year’s FPM Reader Challenge “a search for big ideas,” we had to do some thinking about how one measures the size of an idea. We ended up deciding that a big idea is one that makes a big difference – in our context, a big difference for a family physician’s practice.
We also decided that big ideas aren’t necessarily new ones. The air swarms with ideas that don’t make any difference because we ignore them or brush them away like gnats. They don’t matter until someone sees one for what it is, seizes it out of the air and makes it real. Bringing an idea to life like that is rare enough to be worth celebrating.
Unity in variety
Given the creativity of family physicians, it’s not surprising that every one of the big ideas in this issue is unique. They range from a weight-loss program based on the simple question “Am I hungry?” to a mandatory interview for new patients and from a group-visit house call to a plan for helping the poor afford primary care. The practices that gave rise to the ideas range in size from one physician practicing out of a car to 42 family physicians scattered over several practice facilities. Some focus on making conventional practice more efficient or effective, while others involve highly unconventional practices. The range and variety are exciting.
At the same time, given our ground rules and the fact that we’re all breathing the same air and surrounded by the same clouds of ideas, it’s not surprising that this collection of big ideas includes a number that are in the air today. And certainly it’s no surprise that many are individual solutions to problems that bedevil thousands of family physicians. In fact, you’ll see several themes emerging from the ideas presented, including some that seem very much in tune with the times:
The radical reduction of overhead through practice redesign;
Various ways of disconnecting or insulating practice from the world of third-party payers;
Creative uses of group visits;
Ways of capitalizing on the power of the computer and the electronic medical record;
Efforts to reverse the trend toward seeing more and more patients per day in shorter and shorter visits – to recapture the benefits of the 30-minute visit.
Movement toward a common future
Probably without knowing it, a number of the finalists have implemented aspects of the “new model of practice” advanced by the Future of Family Medicine (FFM) project.1 According to the FFM Project Leadership Committee, the new-model practice is supposed to offer the patient a “personal medical home” without losing sight of the community context. It provides patient-centered, team-based care with a “whole-person orientation,” no barriers to access and a predictable range of services. It employs advanced information systems in innovative offices that emphasize quality and safety while enhancing practice finances.1
Certainly this sounds like a tall order, but if you reread the previous sentence after reading the rest of this issue, you will recognize a piece of it in almost every one of the big ideas featured. While that may be coincidental, I suspect it’s more a sign of shared problems and a growing sense of the kinds of solutions that are needed.
Family medicine needs to slide out of the corner today’s system has pushed it into and find its way both back to what it is supposed to be and ahead to what it can be: patient centered, community oriented, safe, effective, efficient, integrated and all the rest. Most of the 18 finalists on display in this issue are trying in their different ways to move out of the corner and toward that vision. I hope that at least one of them will inspire you to follow suit.
1. Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:3-32. Available online at http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/2/suppl_1/s3. Accessed August 18, 2004.
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
Maternal Immunization Task Force for Pregnant Women: A Call to Action
The current increase in hesitancy about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has created an environment that calls for physicians’ urgent commitment to discussing the evidence-based benefits of vaccination with pregnant women.
Keys to High-Quality, Low-Cost Care: Empanelment, Attribution, and Risk Stratiﬁcation
Understand attribution and alignment methodologies in value-based payment arrangements to know which patients are assigned to you. Use empanelment and risk stratification to better understand where to expend your practice's care management and care coordination resources.