Evaluating the RUC
Fam Pract Manag. 2008 Apr;15(4):11-12.
I'd like to commend Kent Moore and the other authors of “What Every Physician Should Know About the RUC” [February 2008] for an illuminating and insightful article on the fundamental assumptions, biases and mechanics that underlie the financing of Medicare.
All too frequently we collectively moan about the decline of applicants in our noble and altruistic specialty and the economic headwinds facing medical school graduates. It is not by accident that graduates of American medical schools are fleeing primary care. The RUC ensures this. As the article points out, there are only five votes out of 29 on the RUC advocating for primary care, and it requires a two-thirds majority to alter relative values. Is it any wonder that primary health care is undercompensated? Indeed, when insurance payment mechanisms were initially constructed a century ago in Minnesota, surgical interests made certain their reimbursements were at the top of the scale. Their assumptions and policies remain largely unchallenged.
We will never have meaningful realignment of our health care priorities in this country unless we dismantle this arcane paradigm of “one vote per specialty or subspecialty” and confer on primary care its full economic benefit. The AAFP would do well to promulgate this.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
To avoid a negative payment adjustment from Medicare in 2020, practices must achieve a MIPS final score of at least 15 points for the 2018 performance period. Here's how to meet this performance threshold.