AAFP Sustains Fight to Reduce Administrative Burden for Family Medicine
The AAFP recently ramped up efforts calling for an immediate reduction in the regulatory and administrative requirements family physicians and practices must comply with on a daily basis. These burdens range from onerous documentation guidelines to cumbersome prior authorization criteria and the unrelenting frustrations associated with electronic health records. Among the AAFP’s activities:
On October 26, 2017, AAFP President Michael Munger, MD, traveled to Washington, DC, to participate in a roundtable discussion hosted by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator, Seema Verma. Dr. Munger delivered to CMS three administrative reform recommendations for consideration: elimination/reduction of prior authorizations for certain drugs and supplies for established patients; elimination of documentation guidelines for E/M codes for primary care physicians; and repeal of the regulatory framework of the advancing care information requirements under MACRA.
In early 2017, the AAFP published its Agenda for Regulatory and Administrative Reforms. Family physicians are concerned with the ever increasing number of administrative requirements that detract from time that would be better spent on patient care. Studies have estimated that primary care physicians spend nearly 50 percent of their time on overly cumbersome administrative tasks, such as:
- Prior Authorizations
- Performance Measures and Reporting
- Electronic Health Record Documentation
- Care Management Documentation
Prior-authorizations top the list of physician complaints about administrative burden. On Jan. 25, the AAFP and a coalition of 16 other medical organizations called for the reform of prior authorization and utilization management requirements that bog down physicians and impede patient care. Through its "Prior Authorization and Utilization Management Reform Principles(www.ama-assn.org)," the coalition is "urging health insurers and others to apply the reform principles and streamline requirements, lengthy assessments and inconsistent rules in current prior authorization programs."
A 2016 study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that during a typical day, primary care physicians would spend 27 percent of their time on clinical activities and 49 percent on administrative activities. The authors of the study, “Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties(annals.org),” concluded that for every hour primary care physicians spends in direct patient care, they spend two hours engaged in administrative functions.
The AAFP’s advocacy efforts to alleviate family physicians from undue administrative complexity are ongoing, as demonstrated by recent letters to the Trump administration and CMS.
A December 16, 2016, letter from the AAFP to acting CMS Administrator, Andy Slavitt, expresses concern about patient relationship categories and related coding documentation required under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. The requirement will significantly increase the administrative burden that Medicare participating physicians already experience.
A January 31, 2017, letter from the AAFP to President Trump cites research demonstrating how family physicians face a regulatory burden that is unmatched among the various medical disciplines.
On March 21, 2017, the AAFP and nearly 90 other medical organizations sent a letter to CMS Administrator, Seema Verma, calling for the agency to establish a strategy to relieve the electronic health record documentation burden. The letter also called on CMS to create a hardship exemption for physicians who attempted to report PQRS in 2016 but were unsuccessful due to the complexity of the reporting requirements and the significant number of measures that were required.
In an April 26, 2017 letter from the AAFP to CMS Administrator, Seema Verma, the AAFP notes its support of President Trump’s executive order, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs, but calls for CMS to step back and reconsider the current approaches to the Medicare Access and CHIP reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), which we view as overly complex and burdensome to physicians.
In a May 11, 2017 joint letter to CMS Administrator, Seema Verma, the AAFP and a long list of other medical specialty organizations expressed concerns over the agency’s planned enactment of the Social Security Number Removal Initiative. While supportive of the need to protect seniors from identity theft, the signatories called for the change to be made through the traditional notice and comment rulemaking process so that valuable industry feedback may be considered. In addition, the signatories asked that CMS develop a mechanism for providers to quickly and securely access Medicare beneficiary identification numbers to avoid back-office billing headaches and disruptions in access to care for patients.
In a June 8, 2017 letter from the AAFP to CMS Administrator, Seema Verma, the AAFP weighed in on the 2018 Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment proposed rule as published in the April 28 Federal Register. The AAFP expressed a mixture of praise and concern regarding the alignment and simplification of various reporting requirements, as well as ongoing concerns about the readiness of 2015 edition certified EHR technology for 2018 reporting. In addition, the AAFP reminded CMS that the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act was intended to simplify Medicare payment, quality improvement and performance measurement programs, rather than introduce new and cumbersome administrative requirements for physicians that do not improve patient care.
In an October 19, 2017 letter from the AAFP to John R. Graham, Acting Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the AAFP provided guidance for the agency’s draft strategic plan for 2018-2022. The AAFP used the bulk of its seven-page letter to respond to an objective for the first goal that touches on the need to reduce administrative regulatory and operations burdens. The AAFP argued that the final strategic plan "must specifically address" the need to reduce those burdens for practicing physicians.