The AAFP's Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care recently published a one-page policy brief that looked at the projected impact of the Primary Care Residency Expansion program(bhpr.hrsa.gov) (PCRE) on the number and distribution of new primary care physicians.
One key finding: Federal dollars invested in family medicine residencies paid off in terms of physicians practicing primary care in areas of need.
"The findings highlight the potential impact of targeted investment in primary care residency training, with family medicine residency programs representing the highest return on investment for production of physicians working in primary care, health professional shortage areas and rural areas," wrote the authors.
The PCRE was funded by a five-year $168 million grant provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration in 2010 through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The grant was specifically intended to help address the nation's primary care shortage.
- The AAFP's Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care recently looked at the projected impact of the Primary Care Residency Expansion Program on the nation's primary care workforce.
- Family medicine residency programs represented the highest return on investment in terms of turning out primary care physicians who would likely work in health professional shortage areas or rural areas.
- Researchers suggested that future graduate medical education funding should focus on residency programs with proven track records of producing primary care physicians willing to work in areas where they most are needed.
According to the report, when the grant period ends in 2015, the program will have provided financial support to train 900 residents in family medicine, general internal medicine and general pediatrics.
The report, titled "Projected Impact of the Primary Care Residency Expansion Program Using Historical Trends in Graduate Placement," used data from the 2013 AMA Physician Masterfile and other resources to project how many of those residents would indeed practice primary care and how many would likely practice in rural America and health professional shortage areas.
- Specifically, the authors projected that
of 425 family medicine residents, 393 would practice primary care medicine, with 110 of those going to health professional shortage areas and 50 to rural areas;
- of 285 internal medicine residents, 112 would stay in primary care, with 69 practicing in shortage areas and 14 in rural America; and
- of 190 pediatric residents, 97 would practice primary care, with 39 practicing in shortage areas and 3 in rural areas.
The authors concluded that future allocation of GME dollars should take into account which residency programs show they are able to produce primary care physicians dedicated to practicing in areas where they are most needed.
In an interview with AAFP News, Robert Graham Center Research Director Stephen Petterson, Ph.D., said the center's work first and foremost addressed the strong need for more primary care physicians.
He noted that in addition to the PCRE program, the government also was experimenting with creating more teaching health centers and expanding those already in place.
"We don't know if this (the PCRE program) is the best way to increase the number of primary care physicians in the areas of the country where they are most needed, but on the surface, it appears that, if sustained, the PCRE initiative could accomplish both of those goals," said Petterson.
Noting that the PCRE was initiated through money allocated by the 2009 ARRA rather than the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Petterson said that regardless of the promise the program holds, "It is uncertain whether this program will survive, given current budget constraints."
Related AAFP News Coverage
Geographic Inequities Focus of Research Calling for Changes in GME Funding
AAFP Calls for Restructuring System to Meet Public Needs
More From AAFP
Graduate Medical Education Overview