Scheduled maintenance is planned for Dec. 13–14. You may experience brief interruptions during this time.
Nov. 10, 2025, News Staff—CMS has cemented Medicare primary care payment wins next year, which are outlined in the Academy’s summary of the 2026 Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS) and Quality Payment Program (QPP) final rule.
The rule, published Oct. 31, confirms proposals the AAFP largely supported in detailed comments to CMS, including
CMS finalized the 2026 CF, which is the amount Medicare pays per relative value unit, at $33.40, a 3.26% increase over the 2025 CF.
As required by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), the 2026 MPFS introduces a second conversion factor next year, for qualifying alternative payment model (APM) participants. The final rule sets that CF at $33.57, which is 3.77% higher than last year.
Congress mandated 2.5% of the increases to both CFs in H.R. 1.
“The rule’s higher conversion factors and more appropriate valuation of primary care’s real costs will meaningfully rebalance how Medicare compensates family physicians,” said David Tully, the AAFP’s vice president of Government Relations.
The final rule’s change to practice expense information marks another gain for most family physicians as CMS moves toward payment equity.
“CMS is concerned about consolidation and wants to make sure that independent practices can compete with larger, facility-based practices when they are delivering the same services,” said Kate Gilliard, senior manager for federal policy and regulatory affairs in the AAFP’s Government Relations division. “CMS is saying that the cost of doing business is higher for non-facilities, which have more costs per service because they are not operating at the same scale as facilities. To adjust for this, CMS is going to apply a cut to the practice expense portion of the CPT code for all services billed in the facility setting.”
Because many family physicians practice in facilities, Tully said, the AAFP will monitor this change for potential negative effects while urging CMS to avoid penalizing clinicians who work in both settings.
“We’re going to keep calling for exemptions for rural practices,” he said.
CMS’ new efficiency adjustment, the agency says, is meant to keep the values of services fair over time.
“The idea is that when the RUC—the Relative Value Scale Update Committee, volunteer physicians who advise CMS on how to value doctors’ work—assigns value to a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, that code is often new and innovative,” Gilliard said. “Delivering these new services ultimately becomes routine as doctors become more efficient. But the RUC historically has taken a decade or more to revalue a service. To help payment keep up with the reality of care delivery, CMS has applied a 2.5% reduction to only the intra-service portion of the work RVU.”
The good news for primary care clinicians is that evaluation and management (E/M) codes and time-based codes are exempt from this cut, Gilliard added. “The conversion factor will increase as procedural codes are adjusted downward, while the E/M RVU values will not decrease, meaning better payment for primary care services.”
Because CMS will apply the new efficiency adjustment to numerous codes, leading to small reductions in their values, some specialty organizations representing practices that use those codes have begun lobbying Congress to halt this part of the MPFS.
“We need family physicians to voice support for this policy, which is why we’ve activated a new Speak Out campaign,” Tully said.
Because the 2.5% payment increase included in H.R. 1 will expire at the end of 2026, Tully added, “the Academy will keep pressing for systemic Medicare physician payment overhaul ahead of the 2027 fee schedule, with continued emphasis on the need for annual inflationary updates.”
Members can find more details about the final rule, which goes into effect Jan. 1., in the executive summary.