The website may be down at times on Saturday, December 14, and Sunday, December 15, for maintenance. 

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2006;74(5):832-835

Clinical Question: Which is more effective for complex regional pain syndrome following stroke: prednisolone or piroxicam (Feldene)?

Setting: Outpatient (specialty)

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)

Allocation: Concealed

Synopsis: Complex regional pain syndrome, which includes conditions such as causalgia and reflex sympathetic dystrophy, may follow stroke. The researchers identified 106 patients with this syndrome following stroke. After excluding those with diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, heart disease, ulcer, or mild disease, there were 60 patients remaining for the study. These patients were randomized (allocation concealed) to receive piroxicam 20 mg per day or prednisolone 40 mg per day for 14 days, followed by a taper of 10 mg per week. The mean age of participants was 56 years, the age range was 40 to 70 years, and one third were women. Groups were balanced at the start of the study, and there were no dropouts. The primary outcome was a 14-point symptom score, for which 14 was the worst and 0 was the best. After one month, the score decreased from a mean of 10.7 to a mean of 4.3 in the prednisolone group but did not change significantly in the piroxicam group (from 9.8 to 9.4). An improvement of two points or more was considered clinically significant and occurred in 83 percent of patients taking prednisolone compared with 17 percent taking piroxicam (number needed to treat = 1.5)

Bottom Line: Prednisolone provides short-term pain relief in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Longer studies are needed to assess the persistence of this benefit and to better define its risks. (Level of Evidence: 1b)

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.