brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2006;74(6):1023-1024

Clinical Question: Are cancer trial participants representative of cancer patients in the real world?

Setting: Outpatient (specialty)

Study Design: Cohort (retrospective)

Synopsis: Because fewer than 5 percent of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials, the generalizability of the data to all cancer patients is potentially problematic. To evaluate this, the authors used data from a cancer registry that included more than 60,000 patients who were diagnosed between 1990 and 1997. To be included, they had to have undergone at least seven years of follow-up. The authors determined whether the patients participated in a therapeutic clinical trial within four months of diagnosis (early participants), more than four months after diagnosis (late participants), or not at all (nonparticipants). The primary outcome was survival status by the end of 2001. The researchers also assessed the presence of comorbidity, a number of markers of disease severity, and demographic variables to determine their interrelationship with survival.

After excluding patients with multiple cancers and those who had already started treatment, more than 19,000 patients were eligible for this study (5,122 early participants, 1,199 late participants, 13,019 non-participants). Participants were younger, less likely to have chronic comorbid conditions, and were more functional than nonparticipants. However, participants tended to have more distant metastasis and lymph node involvement. After taking the above-mentioned confounding factors into account, participants with localized disease had significantly shorter survival than nonparticipants. Late participants fared even worse. Participants with metastatic disease had significantly longer survival, which could affect the overall results.

Bottom Line: Patients participating in cancer trials are generally younger and healthier than nonparticipants. However, their survival rates are not necessarily better. This study is one of several that question the applicability of clinical trial results to real-world patients. (Level of Evidence: 2b)

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, editor-in-chief.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See https://www.aafp.org/about/this-site/permissions.html for copyright questions and/or permission requests.