brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(12):1837-1838

Clinical Question

What is the best way to predict postoperative pulmonary complications?

Evidence Summary

Pneumonia and respiratory failure are among the most common serious complications following surgery. Models that predict the risk of these complications may help clinicians identify patients who require more intensive monitoring and surgery preparation and identify potentially modifiable risk factors.

Two prediction models have been developed and validated by researchers from the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program.1,2 The models use data from patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers to predict the likelihood of post-operative respiratory failure and pneumonia. The first model (Table 1) was developed using data from 81,719 noncardiac surgeries at 44 medical centers between 1991 and 1993; it was validated using data from 99,390 noncardiac surgeries at 132 medical centers between 1994 and 1995.1 Minor procedures and major transplantations were excluded. Women were also excluded because they were much younger and healthier than the average male patient.1 Patients were followed for 30 days. The model was designed to predict respiratory failure, defined as mechanical ventilation required for at least 48 hours after surgery or as reintubation after having been extubated postoperatively.

VariablesPoints
Type of surgery
Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair27
Thoracic21
Neurosurgery, upper abdominal, or peripheral vascular14
Neck11
Other0
Emergency surgery11
Albumin level less than 3.0 g per dL (30 g per L)9
Blood urea nitrogen level greater than 30 mg per dL (10.7 mmol per L)8
Partially or fully dependent functional status7
History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6
Age (years)
≥ 706
60 to 694
< 600
Total:___

The same researchers developed a second, more complex model (Table 2) to predict the likelihood of postoperative pneumonia.2 The model was developed using data from 160,805 noncardiac surgeries at 97 medical centers between 1997 and 1999; it was validated using data from 155,266 noncardiac surgeries at 100 medical centers between 1995 and 1997.2

Both models performed well in the validation studies, and physicians can use them onfidently to predict the likelihood of pulmonary complications in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. Although it seems reasonable to assume that the models also would be accurate in women, further validation is needed.

The rightsholder did not grant rights to reproduce this item in electronic media. For the missing item, see the original print version of this publication.

Applying the Evidence

A 68-year-old man is about to undergo elective surgery to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm; general anesthesia will be used. He has a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smokes one pack of cigarettes per day. At the time of hospital admission, his albumin level was 3.0 g per dL (30 g per L), and his blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level was 35 mg per dL (12.5 mmol per L). He has not lost weight recently, has no sensorium impairment, has no history of cerebrovascular accident or steroid use, and consumes one or two alcoholic drinks per day. He is functionally independent and lives with his wife. What is the patient's probability of postoperative respiratory failure and pneumonia?

Answer

Using Table 1,1 the patient receives 45 points (27 points for type of surgery, 8 for elevated BUN, 6 for COPD history, and 4 for his age), giving him a very high risk of postoperative respiratory failure. Using Table 2,2 he receives 39 points (15 points for type of surgery, 9 for his age, 3 for BUN, 5 for COPD his-tory, 4 for the use of general anesthesia, and 3 for smoking), giving him a 4.6 per-cent probability of postoperative pneumo-nia. Optimizing his pulmonary function, reducing his BUN level before surgery, and closely monitoring his pulmonary status postoperatively may reduce the patient's risk of complications.

This guide is one in a series that offers evidence-based tools to assist family physicians in improving their decision-making at the point of care.

This series is coordinated by Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS, deputy editor for evidence-based medicine.

A collection of Point-of-Care Guides published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poc.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.