Website maintenance is planned for Saturday, March 25. A brief disruption may occur throughout the day.

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(5):441-444

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Original Article: Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

Issue Date: September 15, 2007

to the editor: The article on lateral epicondylitis provides a useful update of several therapies. In my opinion, however, the term “epicondylitis” is outdated, and although several treatments are well-described in the article, a promising therapy was omitted.

Data suggest that the term “lateral epicondylitis” may be a misnomer because the suffix “-itis” means inflammation. Surgical pathology studies of patients with painful overuse tendon conditions have shown that inflammatory cells are largely absent. Instead, pathologic tissue shows collagen disorganization and separation, mucoid ground substance, focal necrosis, and neovascularization. Inflammation may be present in the earliest stages of tendon disease, but it is unlikely to persist after a few days of elbow pain. These findings have prompted experts to use the term “tendinosis” (chronic tendon condition) or “tendinopathy” (tendon disease).1

Adopting a term that better reflects the underlying pathology is important. First, “elbow tendinopathy” and “epicondylosis” do not suggest inflammation and therefore do not suggest the use of anti-inflammatory medication, as does the term “epicondylitis.” Inappropriate pharmacotherapy for chronic tendon conditions, with resulting cost and comorbidity, is common. As the authors report, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and injected corticosteroids have some effect on acute pain but not on chronic pain. Additionally, a recent study on lateral epicondylosis reported that outcomes with corticosteroid injections were significantly worse than those with physical therapy or nonspecific conservative treatment at one year.2 Second, these terms would be more realistic for patients and would allow physicians to more accurately frame expectations for improvement. And third, it is evidence-based practice.1

I also would like to draw attention to two promising, related therapies for lateral epicondylosis: injections with the sclerosant polidocanol, and injections with dextrose and the sclerosant morrhuate sodium, also known as prolotherapy.3 Both treatments target areas of neovascularity, a prominent pathologic feature of tendinopathy. A Swedish sports medicine group has published eight original papers documenting positive outcomes of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy using polidocanol for tendinopathies, including lateral epicondylosis.4,5 My group recently reported clinically meaningful improvements in pain and functional outcomes in patients with severe lateral epicondylosis treated with prolotherapy.6 At four-month follow-up, patients who received prolotherapy, compared with the control group who received saline injections, reported near-total pain resolution and a 3.6-point absolute effect size on an 11-point Likert elbow pain scale (P <.001). The number needed to treat to achieve a clinically relevant two-point improvement was 1.4. Participants in the prolotherapy group also reported improved isometric resistance strength (P <.01) compared with control patients. The mechanism for these findings is unclear and requires further investigation. Two prolotherapy clinical trials are being conducted by the National Institutes of Health. This therapy is not widely available for clinical use.

editor's note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis,” who declined to reply.

Email letter submissions to afplet@aafp.org. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors. Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Letters may be edited to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, deputy editor.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.