ProcedureIndicationsConsiderationsCost
Diagnostic excision
LEEP
  • CIN 2/3 with unsatisfactory colposcopy (recommended)

    Recurrent CIN 2/3 (recommended)

    CIN 2/3 with satisfactory colposcopy (option)

    CIN 2/3 with satisfactory colposcopy (option)

    Endocervical sampling shows CIN 2/3 (recommended)

    CIN 1 preceded by HSIL or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (option)

    HSIL cytology “see and treat” (option)

    Persistent CIN 1 for at least two years (option)

  • Potential cautery artifact at the margins precluding margin status

    Potential post-LEEP stenosis if crater rim is excessively cauterized

    Potential bleeding at the time of LEEP or during postoperative period

    Associated with an increased risk of preterm labor and low birth weight

$$$
Cold knife conization
  • Same as for LEEP, but preferable when margin status is critical for determining residual disease (e.g., adenocarcinoma in situ, squamous microinvasive disease)

  • Higher rate of hemorrhage than LEEP

    Removes more tissue than LEEP

    Associated with an increased risk of preterm labor and low birth weight

    Consistently associated with extreme preterm labor and delivery (< 28 weeks) and low birth weight (< 2,000 g [4 lb, 6 oz]), whereas LEEP is not

$$$$
Ablation
Cryotherapy
  • Satisfactory colposcopy

    Benign endocervical curettage

    Invasion not present

    Entire lesion visible

    Lesion size ≤ two quadrants

  • No specimen available for histologic analysis

    Risk of preterm labor not increased

$
Laser ablation and laser conization
  • Same as for cryotherapy, but lesion extends into the fornix

  • Risk of preterm labor not increased with laser ablation

    Risk of preterm labor increased if depth of laser conization > 10 mm

$$