brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(4):261-262

Clinical Question

How well do oral hypoglycemics treat type 2 diabetes mellitus without the addition of a second treatment?

Bottom Line

In this retrospective analysis, which benefits from large numbers of patients but suffers from possible biases, patients who initially took an oral hypoglycemic other than metformin (Glucophage) were significantly more likely to require a second oral agent. If prescribed a sulfonylurea, they were more likely to experience a cardiovascular event over the following year; if prescribed a thiazolidinedione or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (gliptin), they incurred significantly more out-of-pocket cost of treatment. Despite guideline recommendations and good evidence of benefit, more than 40% of newly diagnosed patients were not prescribed metformin. (Level of Evidence = 2b)


This study evaluated a data set of one of the national health insurers in the United States. The researchers identified 15,516 patients who were started on a single oral hypoglycemic medicine. They analyzed subsequent prescriptions and hospitalizations for at least one year. Only 57.8% of patients received metformin as their initial therapy, which is recommended by most guidelines based on clear evidence of benefit. About one in four patients initially receiving metformin was eventually prescribed a second oral medicine, which was significantly less than those who started on a sulfonylurea (37.1%), a thiazolidinedione (39.6%), or a gliptin (36.2%). Patients started on a sulfonylurea were more likely than those taking other drugs to be subsequently started on insulin (9.1% vs. 5.1% to 6.2%). Patients started on a sulfonylurea were more likely to experience a cardiovascular event or a diagnosis of hypoglycemia. Patients initially prescribed a thiazolidenidione or a gliptin paid significantly more out of pocket.

Study design: Cohort (retrospective)

Funding source: Industry

Setting: Outpatient (any)

Reference: BerkowitzSAKrummeAAAvornJet alInitial choice of oral glucose-lowering medication for diabetes mellitus: a patient-centered comparative effectiveness study. JAMA Intern Med.2014; 174( 12): 1955– 1962.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.