brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(9):643

Clinical Question

Does arthroscopic surgery improve outcomes for patients with a degenerative meniscal tear and little or no osteoarthritis?

Bottom Line

Arthroscopic repair of degenerative meniscal tears in middle-aged adults does not significantly improve long-term pain or function. Patients should do physical therapy and try to avoid surgery if possible. (Level of Evidence = 1a –)

Synopsis

The authors of this systematic review identified randomized controlled trials that compared arthroscopic meniscal debridement with conservative management for patients with degenerative (nontraumatic) meniscal tears and little or no osteoarthritis. They found a total of seven studies (including five published in 2013) with a total of 805 patients, mostly from Europe. Overall study quality was not impressive. Conservative management generally included a standardized exercise program, although one study used an intra-articular steroid injection and one used sham surgery. Studies employed a variety of outcome measures, so the authors combined them using standardized mean differences for the effect sizes. The mean age of the patients was 53 to 59 years in the seven included studies. Risk of bias was high or uncertain for six of the seven studies, largely because of failure to mask and uncertainty regarding allocation concealment and randomization. In the short term (less than six months) there was a statistically significant improvement in functional outcomes with surgery (standardized mean difference = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.48). However, this improvement was not seen for longer-term outcomes (six months to two years) and did not exceed the threshold for a minimally important difference. Surgery did not improve pain in the short term or in the long term.

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Self-funded or unfunded

Reference: KhanMEvaniewNBediAAyeniORBhandariMArthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ2014;186(14):1057– 1064.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, editor-in-chief.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.