The website may be down at times on Saturday, December 14, and Sunday, December 15, for maintenance. 

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(11):933

Clinical Question

Is the Step-by-Step approach useful for ruling out systemic infection in young low-risk infants?

Bottom Line

The Step-by-Step approach, using a basic physical examination and readily available urine and blood tests (without lumbar puncture; see the Synopsis section), can successfully identify low-risk infants younger than 90 days who will not need empiric antibiotic treatment and lumbar puncture. However, this approach has not been studied (nor has any other approach, I believe) in a randomized controlled trial to see whether it is effective at decreasing lumbar punctures or hospital admissions. (Level of Evidence = 1a)

Synopsis

This study was conducted at 11 European pediatric emergency departments. The researchers enrolled 2,185 previously healthy term infants younger than 90 days with fever without source. The relatively new Step-by-Step approach was evaluated in comparison with the Rochester criteria or the Lab-score (Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(12):968–973), both methods of ruling out invasive bacterial infection. All infants were evaluated via urine dipstick, a urine culture, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, procalcitonin, and blood culture. Eventually, 4% (n = 87) of the infants were given a diagnosis of systemic infection and approximately 45% (n = 991) were classified as low-risk using the Step-by-Step approach. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out infection were 92.0% and 99.3% for the Step-by-Step approach, 81.6% and 98.3% for the Rochester criteria, and 59.8% and 98.1% for the Lab-score. Seven of the 991 infants (0.7%) who were classified as low risk by the score were found to have a systemic infection using the Step-by-Step approach.

The Step-by-Step approach: Children at low risk of systemic infection have the following characteristics: not ill-appearing, younger than 21 days, no leukocyturia, procalcitonin level less than 0.5 ng per mL, C-reactive protein level less than 20 mg per L (190.5 nmol per L), and absolute neutrophil count less than 10,000 per mm3 (10.0 × 109 per L).

Study design: Decision rule (validation)

Funding source: Self-funded or unfunded

Setting: Emergency department

Reference: GomezBMintegiSBressanSDa DaltLGervaixALacroixLEuropean Group for Validation of the Step-by-Step ApproachValidation of the “Step-by-Step” approach in the management of young febrile infants. Pediatrics2016;138(2):e20154381.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.