brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(2):128

Clinical Question

What is the safest and most effective therapy for the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE)?

Bottom Line

Compared with aspirin, the use of rivaroxaban (Xarelto) to extend anticoagulation beyond the initial six to 12 months to treat provoked or unprovoked VTE reduces the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE without increasing the risk of bleeding. You would need to treat approximately 30 to 33 patients with full- or low-dose rivaroxaban to prevent one additional clot. (Level of Evidence = 1b)

Synopsis

These authors recruited 3,396 adult patients with symptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who had received six to 12 months of anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant. Those who already required extended anticoagulation therapy were excluded. Patients were then randomized, using concealed allocation, to receive 20 mg of rivaroxaban, 10 mg of rivaroxaban, or 100 mg of aspirin once daily with a placebo version of the treatment they were not receiving. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics. Approximately 60% of the index VTEs were provoked and 40% were unprovoked. The median duration of study treatment was also similar across the three groups at almost 12 months.

After excluding patients who did not take any study medications, 3,365 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome—a composite of symptomatic, recurrent, fatal, or nonfatal VTE—was decreased in both rivaroxaban groups compared with the aspirin group (20-mg rivaroxaban vs. aspirin: 1.5% vs. 4.4%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.59; 10-mg rivaroxa-ban vs. aspirin: 1.2% vs. 4.4%; HR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47). Rates of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were similar in all three groups (major bleeding: 0.5% with 20-mg rivaroxaban vs. 0.4% with 10-mg rivaroxaban vs. 0.3% with aspirin; non-major bleeding: 2.7% with 20 mg vs. 2.0% with 10 mg vs. 1.8% with aspirin). This study was not powered to determine whether the lower dose of rivaroxaban is noninferior to the higher dose.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)

Funding source: Industry

Allocation: Concealed

Setting: Outpatient (any)

Reference:WeitzJILensingAWPrinsMHet alEINSTEIN CHOICE InvestigatorsRivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med2017;376(13):1211–1222.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, editor-in-chief.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.