The website may be down at times on Saturday, December 14, and Sunday, December 15, for maintenance. 

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(8):online

Clinical Question

Do newer (incretin-based) treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus increase mortality?

Bottom Line

This seems like a strange question considering that the goal is to decrease mortality with drug therapy. Nevertheless, this study showed that the new kids on the diabetes block—exenatide (Byetta), dulaglutide (Trulicity), sitagliptin (Januvia), saxagliptin (Onglyza), and others—do not increase mortality, even in patients with cardiovascular risk. This jury is still out as to whether these agents do what they are supposed to do: decrease mortality as well as blood glucose levels. (Level of Evidence = 1a)

Synopsis

These researchers searched four databases, including Cochrane Central and clinicaltrials.gov, to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors with placebo or active treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes, including a large number of patients with cardiovascular disease. They included 112 studies in which at least one patient died. The studies comprised 151,614 total patients and ranged from 12 to 234 weeks in duration (median 24 weeks). Two researchers independently selected studies for inclusion and evaluated the research for bias, which was generally low. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between incretin drugs vs. control agents (odds ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.02). There was also no increased mortality in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. There was little heterogeneity among the studies and no evidence of publication bias.

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Foundation

Setting: Various (meta-analysis)

Reference:LiuJLiLDengKet alIncretin based treatments and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ2017;357:j2499.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.