brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2018;97(11):755

Clinical Question

Is ultrasonography accurate in detecting synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Bottom Line

In this systematic review of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ultrasonography was reasonably accurate compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting synovitis in fingers and wrists. The use of MRI as a reference standard is convenient, but problematic. (Level of Evidence = 2a–)


The presence of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with developing joint destruction, and early intervention improves outcomes. The authors systematically searched several databases for studies that evaluated the accuracy of ultrasonography compared with MRI for the detection of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Although MRI is a convenient tool and has become the noninvasive reference standard for many conditions, it is arguably less reliable than tissue-based diagnostic standards. Two authors independently assessed each study for inclusion and then assessed the quality of the included studies and had a discussion in the event of disagreements. The authors also graded the quality of the MRIs on the basis of the power of magnet, use of contrast, resolution, and so forth (reinforcing the idea that MRI is a problematic reference standard). Although this study was not funded, two of the authors have significant relationships with industry.

Ultimately, they included 14 studies: five studies assessed a total of 275 wrists, 12 stuides assessed more than 2,060 metacarpophalangeal joints, six studies assessed 1,073 proximal interphalangeal joints, and two studies evaluated 31 knees. Compared with MRI, the overall accuracy for ultrasonography was slightly better for finger joints than for wrists (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.91 for fingers, 0.81 for wrists) and not very accurate for knees (0.61). When the result was abnormal, the ultrasonography was fairly reliable, but when the result was normal, the ultrasonography was only modestly reliable. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−, respectively) and 95% confidence intervals for each joint are as follows:

  • Wrist: LR+ = 3.3 (0.9 to 14.5); LR− = 0.3 (0.1 to 1.1)

  • Metacarpophalangeal joint: LR+ = 9.1 (3.6 to 27); LR− = 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6)

  • Proximal interphalangeal joint: LR+ = 11.8 (1.6 to 31); LR− = 0.3 (0.07 to 0.8)

  • Knee: LR+ = 2.3 (0.7 to 10); LR− = 0.2 (0.01 to 2.2)

Just a reminder: A likelihood ratio of 1 provides no useful information; values less than 0.1 or greater than 10 provide the most useful information (see AFP's evidence-based medicine glossary at The confidence intervals in these studies are wide enough to dampen the authors' conclusions that ultrasonography is accurate enough in detecting synovitis in the fingers.

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Self-funded or unfunded

Setting: Various (meta-analysis)

Reference:Takase-MinegishiKHoritaNKobayashiKet alDiagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford)2018;57(1):49–58.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, editor-in-chief.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at

Continue Reading

More in AFP

Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.