brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(10):online

Clinical Question

Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain?

Bottom Line

Acupuncture, with its meridians, chi, and other concepts that do not seem to line up with anything physiologic, is vexing to most of us who trained in Western medicine. However, this meta-analysis, based on data from almost 21,000 patients, found it to be more effective than no treatment and, to a lesser extent, more effective than sham acupuncture. Given this evidence of benefit and our limited options for chronic pain treatments that do not harm more than help, acupuncture should be added to our armamentarium. (Level of Evidence = 1a–)


To conduct this meta-analysis, the authors identified 44 randomized studies that evaluated the use of acupuncture to treat specific musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, chronic headache, or shoulder pain lasting at least four weeks. The researchers only included studies for which treatment allocation was unambiguously concealed. They combined raw patient data in their meta-analyses for 20,827 patients from 39 trials. For each chronic pain condition, acupuncture was superior to no-acupuncture control, with a moderate effect size of 0.5. Acupuncture was still more effective than sham acupuncture, with an average effect size of 0.2. Treatment effects persisted over time with only a small decrease. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies, which the authors attribute to differences in the control groups. There was limited evidence of publication bias, meaning that small studies showing no benefit may not have been published. This meta-analysis is an update of a previous meta-analysis that identified slightly better effects (

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Government

Setting: Various (meta-analysis)

Reference:VickersAJVertosickEALewithGet alAcupuncture Trialists' CollaborationAcupuncture for chronic pain: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Pain2018;19(5):455–474.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.