brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(4):247-248

Clinical Question

Can the 10-year interval for repeat colonoscopies be extended for patients with no findings?

Bottom Line

Following a high-quality colonoscopy (adequate bowel preparation, full visualization, and high rates of detection by the colonoscopist), patients at average risk with no neoplasm found on examination had the same rate of developing colorectal cancer or dying from it in the 10- to 17-year interval compared with the first five-year interval and the five- to 10-year interval. (Level of Evidence = 1b)

Synopsis

The study, conducted in Poland, included 165,887 patients 50 to 66 years of age without a family history of colorectal cancer who had a negative result from a single screening colonoscopy. Although the patients had access to a subsequent colonoscopy after 10 years, more than 97% did not receive one, providing the opportunity to determine the natural history of colorectal cancer in this nationwide group. Outcomes were assessed through administrative records. For up to 17.4 years after an initial negative colonoscopy result, colorectal cancer incidence and related mortality were 72% and 81% lower than in the general population. Incidence of cancer was lower in patients with high-quality colonoscopy compared with low-quality colonoscopy. The rates of subsequent colorectal cancer and related mortality in patients receiving the high-quality colonoscopy were not different in the 10- to 17-year interval compared with the zero- to five-year and five- to 10-year intervals.

Study design: Cohort (prospective)

Funding source: Government

Setting: Population-based

Reference:PilonisNDBugajskiMWieszczyPet alLong-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after a single negative screening colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med2020;173(2):81–91.

Editor's Note: Dr. Shaughnessy is an assistant medical editor for AFP.

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $145
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available

Article Only

$25.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to just this article
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Sumi Sexton, MD, editor-in-chief.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.