
Am Fam Physician. 2022;105(4):online
Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.


Benefits | Harms |
---|---|
Data inadequate for analysis | 1 in 7 experienced a complication with a cast compared with a splint (number needed to harm = 7) |
Higher risk of complication with a cast compared with a splint (absolute risk difference = 14%) |
Details for This Review
Study Population: Children (two to 16 years of age) with confirmed forearm buckle fractures
Efficacy End Points: Functional recovery and patient satisfaction
Harm End Points: Complications, defined as refracture, cast heaviness, cast tightness, and cast-related return visits
Narrative: Wrist fractures involving the distal radius are the most common fractures in children.1 A buckle (i.e., torus) fracture in children usually occurs at the distal metaphysis where the bone is less dense. This injury is caused by buckling, or folding, of the cortex (the outer layer and thicker section of the bone) due to compression. Buckle fractures are stable, and treatment is intended to relieve pain and discomfort and protect the bone from further injury.2 There is debate about optimal fracture treatment using rigid casts or nonrigid methods (e.g., splints). The systematic review and meta-analysis summarized here compares the clinical effectiveness of nonrigid vs. rigid methods for forearm buckle fractures in children.3
Subscribe
From $165- Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
- More than 130 CME credits/year
- AAFP app access
- Print delivery available
Issue Access
$59.95- Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
- CME credits
- AAFP app access
- Print delivery available