During a system upgrade from Friday, Dec. 5, through Sunday, Dec. 7, the AAFP website, on-demand courses and CME purchases will be unavailable.

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2023;108(5):online

Clinical Question

What treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus decrease the likelihood of patient-oriented outcomes?

Bottom Line

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and other cardiac-related problems. Older treatments, including insulin, do not affect long-term outcomes. Metformin was not found to be more effective than standard treatment to prevent important outcomes, which is consistent with previous findings and may cause it to be removed as a cornerstone of treatment. (Level of Evidence = 1a−)

Synopsis

The investigators searched three databases, including Cochrane Central, and identified 816 English-language randomized controlled studies (N = 471,038) that compared two or more medications for type 2 diabetes. The researchers followed PRISMA criteria for reporting. Approximately one-fourth of the studies had a high risk of bias, usually from lack of masking (62%). The researchers conducted a network meta-analysis and compared all medications with one another by combining direct and indirect evidence across the studies. All the studies were short-term, with a median duration of six months. SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced all-cause mortality to a small extent compared with usual treatment. They also reduced death due to cardiovascular causes, the likelihood of nonfatal myocardial infarction, and admission for heart failure. They have shown similar rates of adverse effects compared with usual care. Finerenone (Kerendia) probably reduces admissions for heart failure and end-stage kidney disease compared with usual care. Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) is associated with the greatest amount of weight loss.

The analysis clarifies which treatments do not have an overall benefit on patient-oriented outcomes. The older treatments, including insulin, do not affect mortality or hospitalizations, and thiazolidinediones increase the likelihood of being admitted for heart failure. Metformin, the cornerstone of treatment in most guidelines, may not have a benefit over standard treatment.

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Foundation

Setting: Various (meta-analysis)

Reference: Shi Q, Nong K, Vandvik PO, et al. Benefits and harms of drug treatment for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2023;381:e074068.

Editor's Note: Dr. Shaughnessy is an assistant medical editor for AFP.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

Primary Care Update, a free podcast focused on POEMs, is available on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.