During a system upgrade from Friday, Dec. 5, through Sunday, Dec. 7, the AAFP website, on-demand courses and CME purchases will be unavailable.

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2025;112(5):558-559

This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for CME.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

In patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, do intraarticular hyaluronic acid injections decrease costs and delay the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA)?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections delay TKA by 299 to 370 days, with multiple courses delaying surgery up to 59 months. Approximately 84% of patients receiving these injections do not undergo TKA within 2 years. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: B, a systematic review and meta-analysis and a systematic review without quality measures.) Among patients with knee OA, intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections decrease use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid injections, and opioid medications. This can potentially save patients thousands of dollars and the health care system billions of dollars. (SOR: B, systematic review of economic retrospective reviews.)

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 retrospective and three prospective cohort studies (N = 2,824,401; patients ages 55.1 ± 12.8 to 70.5 ± 9.2 years) evaluated whether intraarticular hyaluronic acid injections delayed TKA. In seven studies that included the primary outcome of time from diagnosis of knee OA to TKA, the median time was 16 to 30 months for those who received intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection vs 4 to 12 months for those who did not (P < .001). The meta-analysis included four studies showing a mean time of 614 ± 456 days from knee OA diagnosis to TKA for those receiving intra-articular injections vs 234 ± 377 days for those who did not. The mean difference was 299 days (95% CI, 250–348 days). The effect size for intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.38–0.76), which is considered a moderate treatment effect.1

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $180
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 125 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Interested in AAFP membership?  Learn More

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email questions@fpin.org.

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2025 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.