brand logo

Fam Pract Manag. 2004;11(9):16

To the Editor:

Dr. Sanford Brown’s article [“What’s in a name?” Practice Diary, April 2004, page 60] is a good jumping-off point for discussing the Future of Family Medicine project. The use of the word “family” in what we do is hardly “arbitrary,” as stated in the article. When Paul, the patient described in Dr. Brown’s article, has provided well-child and sick care for a toddler, helped that toddler’s father quit smoking, sat up all night with the mother during a difficult second labor, ridden in an ambulance with the new little brother who is being transported to a tertiary care center, reviewed the great-grandmother’s hospice care plan with the nursing staff, and provided grief counseling and short-term anxiolytics to other family members, then he is welcome to reopen the discussion of who can have the word “family” in his or her job description.


Send your comments to Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.

Continue Reading

More in FPM

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.