brand logo

Fam Pract Manag. 2008;15(8):18

Dr. Nancy Ness' recommendation in “A Multiple-Service Rule for E/M Services” [Opinion, June 2008] is simply genius. The implementation is so simple. The reach is so broad. Her plan would go a long way to improve patient care, continuity, comprehensiveness and convenience while lowering cost and complexity. Is anyone at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services listening?

Dr. Ness' suggestion for an E/M rule change makes sense. I am a bit surprised that those looking into containing Medicare costs have not stumbled upon this before. Certainly this was the type of calculus that was used in the days before Medicare and the multiplicity of health insurance plans. I hope this plan gets shared with the appropriate policy-makers.

I recognize it may create “turf” problems in some areas, but if implemented this would improve the remuneration of family physicians who are certainly capable of managing the type of problems presented in the article's example.

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU

Send your comments to fpmedit@aafp.org. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.

Continue Reading


More in FPM

Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.