Uterine Fibroid Tumors: Diagnosis and Treatment



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2007 May 15;75(10):1503-1508.

  Related Editorial

  Patient information: See related handout on uterine artery embolization.

The incidence of uterine fibroid tumors increases as women grow older, and they may occur in more than 30 percent of women 40 to 60 years of age. Risk factors include nulliparity, obesity, family history, black race, and hypertension. Many tumors are asymptomatic and may be diagnosed incidentally. Although a causal relationship has not been established, fibroid tumors are associated with menorrhagia, pelvic pain, pelvic or urinary obstructive symptoms, infertility, and pregnancy loss. Transvaginal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy are available to evaluate the size and position of tumors. Ultrasonography should be used initially because it is the least invasive and most cost-effective investigation. Treatment options include hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, myolysis, and medical therapy. Treatment must be individualized based on such considerations as the presence and severity of symptoms, the patient's desire for definitive treatment, the desire to preserve childbearing capacity, the importance of uterine preservation, infertility related to uterine cavity distortions, and previous pregnancy complications related to fibroid tumors.

Many women develop uterine fibroid tumors (i.e., leiomyomas) as they grow older. In one study, the prevalence of ultrasound-identified tumors ranged from 4 percent in women 20 to 30 years of age to 11 to 18 percent in women 30 to 40 years of age and 33 percent in women 40 to 60 years of age.1 Studies report that 5.4 to 77 percent of women have uterine fibroid tumors, depending on the population studied and the diagnostic method used.1,2 Women often consult family physicians because of symptoms related to fibroid tumors or after the lesions have been diagnosed incidentally during physical or radiologic examinations. This article reviews the epidemiology and etiology of uterine fibroid tumors, common clinical presentations, diagnostic strategies, and treatment options.

SORT: KEY RECCOMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Pelvic and transvaginal ultrasonography should be used as the initial study to confirm the diagnosis of uterine fibroid tumors.

C

24

Expectant management is the treatment of choice for women with asymptomatic uterine fibroid tumors.

B

2527

Hysterectomy may improve symptoms, quality of life, and psychological function in women with symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors.

B

30, 31

There currently is insufficient evidence to determine the best treatment approach for women with uterine fibroid tumors.

C

27, 33


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 1430 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECCOMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECCOMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Pelvic and transvaginal ultrasonography should be used as the initial study to confirm the diagnosis of uterine fibroid tumors.

C

24

Expectant management is the treatment of choice for women with asymptomatic uterine fibroid tumors.

B

2527

Hysterectomy may improve symptoms, quality of life, and psychological function in women with symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors.

B

30, 31

There currently is insufficient evidence to determine the best treatment approach for women with uterine fibroid tumors.

C

27, 33


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 1430 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Epidemiology and Etiology

Leiomyomas are the most common female reproductive tract tumors. They are probably of unicellular origin,3 and their growth rate is influenced by estrogen, growth hormone, and progesterone. Although studies have not clarified the exact process, uterine fibroid tumors arise during the reproductive years and tend to enlarge during pregnancy and regress after menopause. The use of estrogen agonists is associated with an increased incidence of fibroid tumors,4 and growth hormone appears to act synergistically with estradiol in affecting the growth of fibroid tumors. Conversely, progesterone appears to inhibit their growth.

Several studies have documented an increased incidence of uterine fibroid tumors in black women.5 Some evidence also indicates that black women are more likely than white women to have larger and more symptomatic tumors at the time of treatment.610 Table 1510 lists factors associated with the development of fibroid tumors. Recent evidence suggests that women with hypertension have a higher risk of fibroid tumors, possibly through smooth muscle injury or cytokine release.11

Table 1

Factors That Affect the Risk of Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Decreased risk

More than five pregnancies

Postmenopausal status

Prolonged use of oral contraceptives

Smoking

Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera)

Increased risk

40 years or older

Black race

Family history of uterine fibroid tumors

Nulliparity

Obesity


Information from references 5 through 10.

Table 1   Factors That Affect the Risk of Uterine Fibroid Tumors

View Table

Table 1

Factors That Affect the Risk of Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Decreased risk

More than five pregnancies

Postmenopausal status

Prolonged use of oral contraceptives

Smoking

Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera)

Increased risk

40 years or older

Black race

Family history of uterine fibroid tumors

Nulliparity

Obesity


Information from references 5 through 10.

Clinical Features

Because of the high prevalence of uterine fibroid tumors and the fact that many are asymptomatic, attributing symptoms specifically to the tumors is problematic. Although evidence is largely drawn from uncontrolled studies, uterine fibroid tumors are commonly identified in women who have menorrhagia, pelvic pain, obstructive symptoms, infertility, or pregnancy loss.

Menstrual abnormalities, including menorrhagia, are the most common symptoms associated with uterine fibroid tumors. Submucosal tumors are often cited as a cause of menorrhagia, but there is no evidence that the endometrium over submucosal tumors differs from that overlying other areas of the uterus.12 Fibroid tumors may produce a dysregulation of local growth factors, causing vascular abnormalities that contribute to menorrhagia13 and are unrelated to their location in the uterus. One study attributed 11 percent of cases of symptomatic menorrhagia to uterine fibroid tumors.14 Conversely, a population-based study did not find any evidence relating general abnormalities in menstrual cycle length or heaviness to the presence of fibroid tumors.15

Pelvic pain and pressure are less commonly attributed to uterine fibroid tumors. Individual case reports have described very large tumors that result in pelvic discomfort, respiratory failure, urinary symptoms, and constipation.1618 During pregnancy, the combination of large fibroid tumors and uterine enlargement can result in symptoms of urinary tract obstruction,19 abdominal pain (attributed to the degeneration of fibroid tumors), and, possibly, an increased risk of placental abruption if the tumor is located retroplacentally.20

The role of fibroid tumors in infertility is controversial. Many of the studies examining the relationship between these tumors and infertility are retrospective and non-randomized. Current evidence suggests that submucosal and intramural fibroid tumors that distort the uterine cavity can impair in vitro fertilization attempts.21 The impact of intramural and subserosal fibroid tumors that do not distort the intrauterine cavity is unclear. Despite the lack of clear evidence of their role in conception problems, submucosal fibroid tumors, intramural fibroid tumors that distort the uterine cavity, fibroid tumors larger than 5 cm, and multiple fibroid tumors are often treated in patients with otherwise unexplained infertility.22 The possible role of fibroid tumors in early miscarriage is also controversial. Given the conflicting data and potential observational bias and methodologic problems in studies examining this association, a causal relationship should not be assumed.23

Diagnosis

The bimanual examination is often the first indication that a patient may have uterine fibroid tumors. Several studies, including transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may be helpful in evaluating these tumors. Transvaginal ultrasonography has the lowest sensitivity and specificity, but it is the best initial test based on its noninvasive nature and cost-efficiency. MRI is preferred when precise myoma mapping is required (usually for surgical purposes), but it is the most expensive modality for evaluating fibroid tumors. Sonohysterography and hysteroscopy can be used to evaluate the extent of submucosal fibroid tumors, but these tests are relatively invasive.24

Management

Knowing the full range of treatment options enables family physicians to counsel patients about the optimal management of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors. The number of treatment options is increasing and includes expectant management, surgery, uterine artery embolization, ablative techniques, and medical management (Table 2). Clinical guidelines have been created to assist patients and physicians in choosing appropriate management options25  (Table 3). However, a systematic review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality emphasized the paucity of evidence to support specific procedures and treatments based on individual patient characteristics.26,27

Table 2

Comparison of Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Fertility preserved?

Gonadotropin- releasing hormone agonists

Preoperative treatment to decrease size of tumors before hysterectomy, myomectomy, or myolysis

Decreases blood loss and operative and recovery time

Long-term treatment associated with high cost, menopausal symptoms, and bone loss; increased recurrence risk with myomectomy

Dependent on subsequent procedure

Hysterectomy

Surgical removal of the uterus (transabdominal, transvaginal, or laparoscopic)

Definitive treatment for women who do not wish to preserve fertility Vaginal procedure associated with less blood loss, pain, and fever and greater patient satisfaction compared with abdominal procedure

Surgical risks

No

Myolysis

In situ destruction of tumors by heat, laser, or cryotherapy

Ease and rapidity of procedure; minimal blood loss; rapid recovery time

Delay in reduction of uterine size; unknown risk of recurrence; prolonged vaginal bleeding

Unknown

Myomectomy

Surgical or endoscopic excision of tumors

Resolution of symptoms with preservation of fertility; perioperative morbidity similar to that with hysterectomy

Fibroid recurrence rate of 15 to 30 percent at five years; success of procedure determined by number and extent of tumors

Yes

Uterine artery embolization

Interventional radiologic procedure to occlude uterine arteries

Minimally invasive; avoids surgery; short hospital stay (24 to 36 hours)

Symptom recurrence of more than 17 percent at 30 months; risk of extended hospitalization for postprocedure pain

No (limited experience)

Table 2   Comparison of Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

View Table

Table 2

Comparison of Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Treatment Description Advantages Disadvantages Fertility preserved?

Gonadotropin- releasing hormone agonists

Preoperative treatment to decrease size of tumors before hysterectomy, myomectomy, or myolysis

Decreases blood loss and operative and recovery time

Long-term treatment associated with high cost, menopausal symptoms, and bone loss; increased recurrence risk with myomectomy

Dependent on subsequent procedure

Hysterectomy

Surgical removal of the uterus (transabdominal, transvaginal, or laparoscopic)

Definitive treatment for women who do not wish to preserve fertility Vaginal procedure associated with less blood loss, pain, and fever and greater patient satisfaction compared with abdominal procedure

Surgical risks

No

Myolysis

In situ destruction of tumors by heat, laser, or cryotherapy

Ease and rapidity of procedure; minimal blood loss; rapid recovery time

Delay in reduction of uterine size; unknown risk of recurrence; prolonged vaginal bleeding

Unknown

Myomectomy

Surgical or endoscopic excision of tumors

Resolution of symptoms with preservation of fertility; perioperative morbidity similar to that with hysterectomy

Fibroid recurrence rate of 15 to 30 percent at five years; success of procedure determined by number and extent of tumors

Yes

Uterine artery embolization

Interventional radiologic procedure to occlude uterine arteries

Minimally invasive; avoids surgery; short hospital stay (24 to 36 hours)

Symptom recurrence of more than 17 percent at 30 months; risk of extended hospitalization for postprocedure pain

No (limited experience)

Table 3

Recommended Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Patient characteristics Treatment options

Asymptomatic women

Observation

Symptomatic women who desire fertility preservation

Nonsurgical treatment or myomectomy

Symptomatic women who do not desire future fertility but wish to preserve the uterus

Nonsurgical treatment or myomectomy, myolysis, or uterine artery embolization

Women who desire fertility preservation and have had a pregnancy complicated by uterine fibroid tumors

Myomectomy

Infertile women with distortion of uterine cavity

Myomectomy

Women with severe symptoms who desire definitive treatment

Hysterectomy

Table 3   Recommended Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

View Table

Table 3

Recommended Treatment Options for Women with Uterine Fibroid Tumors

Patient characteristics Treatment options

Asymptomatic women

Observation

Symptomatic women who desire fertility preservation

Nonsurgical treatment or myomectomy

Symptomatic women who do not desire future fertility but wish to preserve the uterus

Nonsurgical treatment or myomectomy, myolysis, or uterine artery embolization

Women who desire fertility preservation and have had a pregnancy complicated by uterine fibroid tumors

Myomectomy

Infertile women with distortion of uterine cavity

Myomectomy

Women with severe symptoms who desire definitive treatment

Hysterectomy

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

Expectant management with observation is increasingly recognized as a reasonable course for women with asymptomatic small and large fibroid tumors. Even rapidly growing tumors should not be removed routinely because the risk of a malignant leiomyosarcoma is small (0.23 percent in one study).28,29

SURGICAL TREATMENTS

Selected patients may benefit from surgery. One of the biggest challenges is identifying malignant leio-myosarcomas; rapid growth alone is not an adequate marker. There is evidence that combining dynamic MRI (i.e., MRI enhanced by gadopentetate dimeglumine) and measurement of serum lactate dehydrogenase levels is useful in distinguishing leiomyosarcoma from benign fibroid tumors.29 This approach may be useful in evaluating selected patients, such as postmenopausal women with enlarging tumors. Other patients who may benefit from surgery include those with persistent abnormal uterine bleeding or symptoms resulting from uterine bulk that do not respond to conservative measures.26

Hysterectomy

The presence of uterine fibroid tumors is the most common indication cited for hysterectomy, accounting for more than 30 percent of these procedures.26 Although most hysterectomies in women with fibroid tumors are performed for symptomatic relief, the procedure is sometimes recommended to asymptomatic women whose uterine size is estimated to be greater than that at 12 weeks' gestation. Common justifications for this recommendation include the risk that tumors of this size could potentially mask other adnexal pathology, increase operative morbidity rates, and become malignant. Current evidence does not support the treatment of fibroid tumors in asymptomatic women.2527

The Maryland Women's Health Study30 and the Maine Women's Health Study31 were large, prospective studies designed to measure the outcomes and effectiveness of hysterectomy for benign conditions. The most common indication for surgery in both studies was uterine fibroid tumors (48.1 and 35 percent, respectively). These studies demonstrated that hysterectomy substantially improves symptoms and quality of life in women with multiple and severe symptoms associated with gynecologic disorders. The Maine study enrolled a comparison group of women who received nonsurgical medical treatment.31 Medical therapy for abnormal bleeding and chronic pelvic pain produced significant improvements, but one quarter of the nonsurgical group subsequently underwent hysterectomy. Women with uterine fibroid tumors who continued with nonsurgical treatment reported no significant changes in symptoms or quality of life over the one year follow-up. Not all women who are treated surgically report improvement. In the Maryland study, almost 8 percent of women had more or the same number of symptoms 24 months after hysterectomy.30 Baseline depression, therapy for emotional problems, annual income of less than $35,000, and bilateral oophorectomy were significantly associated with poorer outcomes. Some women in the Maine study reported new symptoms after hysterectomy (e.g., hot flashes, weight gain, depression).31 Most studies evaluating the effect of hysterectomy on sexuality are poorly designed, but the available evidence suggests that hysterectomy does not adversely affect sexuality.32

Myomectomy

Myomectomy (i.e., surgical removal of fibroid tumors while preserving the uterus) traditionally has been performed by laparotomy. Endoscopic myomectomy is now a treatment option for many women, and hysteroscopic myomectomy may be considered in women with symptomatic submucosal fibroid tumors. Ultimately, however, the choice of surgical approach is largely dependent on the expertise of the physician. Although elective cesarean delivery traditionally has been recommended for women who become pregnant after myomectomy (especially when the uterine cavity has been entered), data to support this recommendation are limited.33

Uterine Artery Embolization

Uterine artery embolization is performed under intravenous sedation. Using a femoral approach, a micro-catheter is introduced into the uterine artery. Polyvinyl alcohol foam particles or other occluding agents are then injected. Complete occlusion of both uterine arteries initially was the goal of this treatment, but recent data suggest that incomplete embolization may produce effective infarction of myomas with less severe pain.34 The Fibroid Registry for Outcomes Data was formed in 1999 to collect prospective data on more than 3,000 women undergoing embolization for fibroid tumors. Short-term outcomes in women included in this database have been encouraging. In the first 30 days after treatment, the incidence of adverse effects was low, and major complications in the hospital and 30 days postdischarge were uncommon (0.66 and 4.8 percent, respectively).35 Future data will address long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization.

Myolysis

Myolysis (i.e., delivering energy to tumors to desiccate them directly or disrupt their blood supply) is most often performed with the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser or bipolar needles. Combination treatment with myolysis and endometrial ablation may reduce the need for subsequent procedures in patients with persistent bleeding.36

MEDICAL TREATMENTS

Medical therapy is available for women with symptomatic fibroid tumors who prefer conservative management.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists

Gonado-tropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are the most well-established therapy for medical management, causing amenorrhea and a rapid reduction in the size of the tumor. However, the benefits of GnRH agonists are tempered by significant side effects resulting from hypoestrogenism (e.g., hot flashes, vaginal dryness, bone demineralization). Because GnRH agonists are not appropriate for long-term use, this therapy is best suited for women in the perimenopausal or preoperative periods.37

Hormone Therapy

Hormone therapy with cyclic or noncyclic estrogen–progestin combinations appears to be ineffective in alleviating the symptoms of fibroid tumors and limiting tumor growth.26 Studies have found no evidence that low-dose contraceptives cause the growth of uterine fibroid tumors; thus, these tumors are not a contraindication to the use of these contraceptives. A small study found significant improvement in bleeding after treatment with depot medroxy-progesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) in 20 African women with menorrhagia attributed to uterine fibroid tumors.38 A review of six clinical trials with a total of 166 women demonstrated that treatment with mife-pristone (Mifeprex) resulted in reduced tumor size and improvement in symptoms.39 However, none of the studies were placebo controlled or blinded, and a notable adverse effect was the development of endometrial hyperplasia. Better-quality clinical trials are needed before recommendations can be made.

Other Therapies

The selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene (Evista) has been shown in one small study to decrease tumor size in postmenopausal women; however, there was no effect on uterine bleeding.40 Small trials have provided insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the management of uterine fibroid tumors.41 A noninvasive treatment using a combination of MRI and ultrasonography (ExAblate 2000) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.42 This treatment focuses high-intensity sound waves on the tumor, inducing coagulation necrosis. The main advantage is that it is an out-patient procedure with a short recovery time. Long-term follow-up and additional studies are needed to identify women who will benefit most from this treatment.

The Authors

PATRICIA EVANS, MD, is an assistant professor and the program director of the Georgetown University-Providence Hospital Family Practice Residency Program, Colmar Manor, Md. She received her medical degree from Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, and completed a family medicine residency and obstetrics fellowship at Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

SUSAN BRUNSELL, MD, is a family physician in the Executive Healthcare Department at the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. She received her medical degree from Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. Dr. Brunsell completed a family medicine residency at Malcolm Grow U.S. Air Force Medical Center, Andrews Air Force Base, Md., and a women's health fellowship at the University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville.

Address correspondence to Patricia Evans, MD, Georgetown University-Providence Hospital Family Practice Residency Program, 4151 Bladensburg Rd., Colmar Manor, MD 20722. Reprints are not available from the authors.

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Navy Medical Department or the U.S. Navy at large.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Lurie S, Piper I, Woliovitch I, Glezerman M. Age-related prevalence of sonographically confirmed uterine myomas. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:42–4.

2. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B. Fibroids (uterine myomatosis, leiomyomas). Am Fam Physician. 2005;71:1753–6.

3. Hashimoto K, Azuma C, Kamiura S, Kimura T, Nobunaga T, Kanai T, et al. Clonal determination of uterine leiomyomas by analyzing differential inactivation of the X-chromosome-linked phosphoglycerokinase gene. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;40:204–8.

4. Chalas E, Constantino JP, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N, Lewis GC, Bergman C, et al. Benign gynecologic conditions among participants in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1230–7.

5. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Stewart EA, Rosenberg L. Age-specific incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women's Health Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:563–8.

6. Kjerulff KH, Langenberg P, Seidman JD, Stolley PD, Guzinski GM. Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age of diagnosis. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:483–90.

7. Ross RK, Pike MC, Vessey MP, Bull D, Yeates D, Casagrande JT. Risk factors for uterine fibroids: reduced risk associated with oral contraceptives [Published correction appears in Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;293:1027]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293:359–62.

8. Ligon AH, Morton CC. Leiomyomata: heritability and cytogenetic studies. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:8–14.

9. Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Marsico S, Surace M, Ricci E. Use of oral contraceptives and uterine fibroids: results from a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:857–60.

10. Lumbiganon P, Rugpao S, Phandhu-fung S, Laopaiboon M, Vudhika-mraksa N, Werawatakul Y. Protective effect of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate on surgically treated uterine leiomyomas: a multicentre case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:909–14.

11. Boynton-Jarrett R, Rich-Edwards J, Malspeis S, Missmer SA, Wright R. A prospective study of hypertension and risk of uterine leiomyomata. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:628–38.

12. Lumsden MA, Wallace EM. Clinical presentation of uterine fibroids. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;12:177–95.

13. Stewart EA, Nowak RA. Leiomyoma-related bleeding: a classic hypothesis updated for the molecular era. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:295–306.

14. Warner PE, Critchley HO, Lumsden MA, Campbell-Brown M, Douglas A, Murray GD. Menorrhagia I: measured blood loss, clinical features, and outcome in women with heavy periods: a survey with follow-up data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1216–23.

15. Marino JL, Eskenazi B, Warner M, Samuels S, Vercellini P, Gavoni N, et al. Uterine leiomyoma and menstrual cycle characteristics in a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2350–5.

16. Oelsner G, Elizur SE, Frenkel Y, Carp H. Giant uterine tumors: two cases with different clinical presentations. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;1015 pt 21088–91.

17. Courban D, Blank S, Harris MA, Bracy J, August P. Acute renal failure in the first trimester resulting from uterine leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:472–3.

18. Chaparala RP, Fawole AS, Ambrose NS, Chapman AH. Large bowel obstruction due to benign uterine leiomyoma. Gut. 2004;53:386,430.

19. Monga AK, Woodhouse CR, Stanton SL. Pregnancy and fibroids causing simultaneous urinary retention and ureteric obstruction. Br J Urol. 1996;77:606–7.

20. Rice JP, Kay HH, Mahony BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;1605 pt 11212–6.

21. Rackow BW, Arici A. Fibroids and in-vitro fertilization: which comes first?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:225–31.

22. Bajekal N, Li TC. Fibroids, infertility and pregnancy wastage. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:614–20.

23. Cooper NP, Okolo S. Fibroids in pregnancy—common but poorly understood. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:132–8.

24. Griffin KW, Ellis MR, Wilder L, DeArmond L. Clinical inquiries. What is the appropriate diagnostic evaluation of fibroids? J Fam Pract. 2005;54:458,460,462.

25. Lefebvre G, Vilos G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, Arneja J, Birch C, et al., for the Clinical Practice Gynaecology Committee, Society for Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The management of uterine leiomyomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:396–418.

26. Myers ER, Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby T, Couchman G, Matcher DB, McCrory DC. Management of leiomyomata: what do we really know?. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:8–17.

27. Matchar DB, Myers ER, Barber MW, Couchman GM, Datta S, Gray RN, et al. Management of uterine fibroids. Evidence Report No. 34. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001.

28. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:414–8.

29. Schwartz PE, Kelly MG. Malignant transformation of myomas: myth or reality? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33:183–98,xii.

30. Kjerulff KH, Rhodes JC, Langenberg PW, Harvey LA. Patient satisfaction with results of hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1440–7.

31. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ Jr. The Maine Women's Health Study: I. Outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:556–65.

32. Farrell SA, Kieser K. Sexuality after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;956 pt 21045–51.

33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Surgical alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Number 16, May 2000. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73:285–93.

34. Marshburn PB, Matthews ML, Hurst BS. Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33:125–44.

35. Worthington-Kirsch R, Spies JB, Myers ER, Mulgund J, Mauro M, Pron G, et al. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes [Published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:869]. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:52–9.

36. Goldfarb HA. Myoma coagulation (myolysis). Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000;27:421–30.

37. Rackow BW, Arici A. Options for medical treatment of myomas. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2006;33:97–113.

38. Venkatachalam S, Bagratee JS, Moodley J. Medical management of uterine fibroids with medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo Provera): a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24:798–800.

39. Steinauer J, Pritts EA, Jackson R, Jacoby AF. Systematic review of mife-pristone for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1331–6.

40. Sammartino PS, Di Carlo C, Affinoto P, Zullo F, Nappi C. Effects of raloxifene treatment on uterine leiomyomas in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:38–43.

41. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B. Fibroids (uterine myomatosis, leiomyomas). Clin Evid. 2005:(14):2264–82.

42. Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, et al. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:48–54.


Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article